Welcome to Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology
Volume 20Issue 2
.
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Meng, LIU Li, VERES S. M.. Robustness assessment for flight control system of an oceanographic unmanned aerial vehicle[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 20(2): 158-167.
Citation: LI Meng, LIU Li, VERES S. M.. Robustness assessment for flight control system of an oceanographic unmanned aerial vehicle[J].JOURNAL OF BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 20(2): 158-167.

Robustness assessment for flight control system of an oceanographic unmanned aerial vehicle

  • Received Date:2010-07-02
  • A post-design robustness assessment for the longitudinal flight control system of an oceanographic unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is presented in this paper. Two novel systematic approaches of generating the linear fractional transformation (LFT) model directly from nonlinear equations are proposed for this particular robustness analysis problem. The closed-loop system combined with each controller is used to determine combinations of aerodynamic parameters that result in worst-case performance. Classical simultaneous gain and phase margin stability metrics currently used in the aerospace industry are introduced for the certification of robustness of this uncertain multivariable system. The results show that the control system remains stable and achieves desired performance for all possible parameter variations over a specified range in both frequency domain and time domain.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Bannett M. Development of technologies for low-cost oceanographic unmanned aeronautical vehicles . Southampton: University of Southampton, 2008.
    [2]
    Li Meng, Liu Li, Veres S M. Aerodynamic parameter estimation of an unmanned aerial vehicle based on extended Kalman filter and its higher order approach //Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE-ICACC. Shenyang: IEEE, 2010.
    [3]
    Bates D G, Kureemun R, Mannchen T. Improved clearance of a flight control law using μ -analysis techniques[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2003, 26(6): 869-884.
    [4]
    Mannchen T, Bates D G, Postlethwaite I. Modeling and computing worst-cast uncertainty combinations for flight control system analysis[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2002, 25(6): 1029-1039.
    [5]
    Doyle J C, Packard A, Zhou K. Review on LFTs, LMIs, and μ //Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Brighton, England: IEEE, 1991: 1227-1232.
    [6]
    Morton B, McAfoos R. New applications of μ to real parameter variation problems //Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Fort Lauderdale, Florida: IEEE, 1985: 233-238.
    [7]
    Paw Y C, Balas G J. Parametric uncertainty modeling for LFT model realization //IEEE Multi-conference on System and Control. San Antonio, Texas: IEEE, 2008: 834-839.
    [8]
    Balas G J, Chiang R, Packard A, et al. Robust control toolbox 3.4 user's guide[M]. Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks, 2009.
    [9]
    Shin J Y, Balas G J, Packard A. Worst-cast analysis of the X-38 crew return vehicle flight control system [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2001, 24(2): 261-269.
    [10]
    Deodhare G, Patel V. A modern look at gain and phase margins: an H / μ approach //Proceedings of AIAA Conference on Guidace, Navigation and Control. Boston: AIAA, 1998: 325-335.
    [11]
    Bates D G, Kureemun Postlethwaite I. Quantifying the robustness of flight control systems using Nichols exclusion regions and the structured singular value[J]. IMechE Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 2001, 215(16): 625-638.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者:陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1.

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1139) PDF downloads(238) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

      Return
      Return
        Baidu
        map