An Analysis of the Proto-Provinces During the Early Period of Tang Dynasty
-
摘要:唐初的行台尚书省是金元行省的前身,实际上维持了不到十年的时间,并未能转化为一级地方行政机构。唐初行台省设置被废除而未转为固定机构的原因有二:第一,行台长官手握重兵。军政合一使地方将领拥兵自重,易于发生叛乱,因此被撤除。第二,唐初六道行台设置目的不同。正常的统治秩序中同一级机构的地位、作用大体相同,但唐初六道中,虽然陕东等道设置目的中包含行政功能,然而显州、东南以及山东道行台的设置却另有原因。Abstract:Although some scholars have regarded the proto-province in the early period of the Tang Dynasty as the predecessor of the pre-province in the Jin and Yuan Dynasty,but in fact it had been maintained no more than ten years,and can not be understood as a level of local setup.This paper starts with the background of establishment of the proto-provinces,and goes further into the analysis of the reasons for its being abolished and not transformed into a fixed organization.The reasons are as follows: first of all,the administrators of the proto-provinces held the massive power.A unified management of the military affairs and the administrative affairs causes the local military officers to become self-important,to be liable to make rebellion,therefore their removal is also inevitable;Secondly,the purposes to set up the six proto-provinces are different.In normal ruling order,the position and function of the organs at the same level should be almost no different,but among the six proto-provinces,although the proto-provinces like Shanndong were established for purpose of exercising administrative function,some proto-provinces as Xianzhou,Dongnan and Shandong,are set up for other purposes.
-
Key words:
- proto-province/
- establishment background/
- establishment purpose
-
[26]杜文玉.论隋唐时期的行台省[J].渭南师专学报,1993,2:51—59,52.. [2] 王大华,朱正威.论行省制的历史价值及其终结[J].陕西师范大学学报,1988,3:3—11;李治安.元代行省制起源与演化述论[J]. 南开学报,1997,2:59—67;李治安.元代行省制的特点与历史作用[J].历史研究,1997,5:82—99;孟宪军.试论金代的行省[J].辽 宁师范大学学报,1995,5:76—79;贾云.唐贞观诸道的产生及其使职的作用[J].汉中师范学院学报,2002,3:47—54. [3] 郭锋.唐代道制改革与三级制地方行政体制的形成[J].历史研究,2002,6:95—108. [4] (唐)杜佑.通典(卷22)职官四[M].中华书局,1988:611. [5] 以下二表史实来自:(后晋)刘昫.旧唐书[M].中华书局,1975;(宋)欧阳修,宋祁.新唐书[M].中华书局,1975. [7]每郎中兼京省二司. [7] 杜文玉《论隋唐时期的行台省》提出,武德元年群雄割据大局未定,故而无可能在此时设置陕东大行台,但笔者认为两《唐 书》关于元年置陕东道行台的记载并无错误,原因见下文. [8] 武德七年,平辅公佑乱. [9] 三年四月,置益州道行台,以益、利、会、鄜、泾、遂六总管隶焉. [10] 四年朝廷闻刘黑闼作乱,置山东道行台于洺州,魏、冀、定、沧并置总管府. [11] 襄州道即山南道、河北道即山东道,杜文玉《论隋唐时期的行台省》文中已有详述. [12] 欧阳修,宋祁.新唐书[M].卷49下《百官志四下》:312. [15][17][19]司马光.资治通鉴(卷187)唐纪三[M].中华书局,1956:5839,5838,5839,5862. [14] 此处距离为直线距离,约数. [21]司马光.资治通鉴[M].卷188《唐纪四》:5884.5884. [16] 刘昫.旧唐书[M].卷1《高祖本纪》:9.在《资治通鉴》中,武德二年只有以杜伏威为淮南安抚大使、和州总管的记载。但武德 三年却下诏“以和州总管、东南道行台尚书令楚王杜伏威为……”。而新旧《唐书》皆为武德二年“授和州总管、东南道行台 尚书令,封楚王。”由此可见,武德二年杜伏威投降之际,当已受行台尚书令矣. [17] 司马光.资治通鉴[M].卷190《唐纪六》:5981. [24]刘昫.旧唐书[M].卷1《高祖本纪》:8.12. [19] 刘昫.旧唐书[M].卷38《地理志一》:1421. 唐初行台省浅析 [20] 刘昫.旧唐书[M].卷2《太宗本纪上》:24. [21] 宋敏求.唐大诏令集[Z].学林出版社,1992:133. [22] 刘昫.旧唐书[M].卷57《裴寂传》:2293. [23] 刘昫.旧唐书[M].卷58《唐俭传》:2312. [24] 刘昫.旧唐书[M].卷59《屈突通传》:2321. 周书[M].卷28《史宁传》:471. 周书[M].卷35《崔猷传》:616. 隋书[M].卷1《高祖杨坚本纪》:16. [28] 司马光.资治通鉴[M].卷188《唐纪四》:5879. [29] 董诰,等.全唐文(卷744)成都记序[M].上海古籍出版社,1990. [40]刘昫.旧唐书[M].卷60《宗室传》:2347,2348. [31] 刘昫.旧唐书[M].卷65《高士廉传》:2443. [32] 董诰,等.全唐文(卷2)检校益州夔州狱讼诏[Z].6. [33] 司马光.资治通鉴[M].卷189《唐纪五》:5926. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数:448
- HTML全文浏览量:2
- PDF下载量:44
- 被引次数:0
下载:
