[1] |
Paradis, C., and LaCharite, D. Preservation and minimality in loanword adaptation[J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1997(33): 379-430. |
.[10] 牛津高阶英汉双解词典(第四版增补本)[Z]. 商务印书馆,牛津大学出版社. 2002: 1835-1842. |
[3] |
Uffmann, C. Patterns of vowel epenthesis (not only)in Shona loanwords [A]. In: Fery, C., Green, A.D., van de Vijver, R.(eds.).Proceedings of HILP 5 [C]. Potsdam: University of Potsdam, 2001: 193-211. |
[13] Kager, R. Optimality Theory[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. |
[5] |
Insights into Linguistics and Semiotics, 1999(37). |
[6] |
张吉生. 优选论与汉语外来语的音节可接受性[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2003(4):7-12. |
[7] |
Peperkamp, S., and Dupoux, E. Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: the role of perception [A]. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences [C], Barcelona, 2003: 367-370. |
[8] |
Steriade, Donca. The phonology of perceptibility effects: the P-map and its consequences for constraint organization[Z]. UCLA ms. 2001. |
[9] |
Kenstowicz, M. Salience and similarity in loanword adaptation: a case study from Fijian[D]. Unpublished manuscript, MIT. , 2003. |
[10] |
Yip, M. Cantonese loanword phonology and optimality theory[J]. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1993(2): 261-291. |
[11] |
于辉. 汉语中英语借词的知觉、音系分析要要以音译词中的流音(l、r)为例[J]. 语言研究, 2007(4):87-93. |
[12] |
Uffmann, C. Epenthetic vowel quality in loanwords: empirical and formal issues[J]. In Kenstowicz & Uffmann(eds.), Lingua, 2006(7): 1079-1111 |
[13] |
张吉生. 再论汉语外来语音节可接受性的优选分析[J]. 外国语, 2006(2):25-32. |
[14] |
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul. Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar [R]. Ms. Rutgers University and University of Colorado, 1993. |
[15] |
范烨. 二语韵尾辅音群中的增音分析要要优选论及感知图框架下的新视角[J]. 外国语, 2008(1): 53-61. |
[16] |
Li, Wen-Chao. A diachronically-motivated segmental phonology of Mandarin Chinese [J]. New York: Peter Lang, Berkeley |
[17] |
Ramsey, S. R. The languages of China[M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987:45. |
[18] |
Lombardi, L. Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in optimality theory [J]. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,1999(17): 267-302. |