在伦理与法理之间:一种古老权利的重新构造——家庭权法律问题初步研究
Between Ethics and Jurisprudence: Reproduction of an Ancient Right——Preliminary Studies on Legal Issues on Family Rights
-
摘要:家庭是人类社会的基本细胞,是国家与公民之间联系的桥梁。家庭具有维护家庭成员利益与维持社会秩序的双重功能,家庭权具有“权利”与“权力”的双重属性。个人主义理念盛行,家庭权中“权力性因素”弱化,“权利性因素”彰显,家庭在现代社会遭遇重大挑战。为发挥家庭在现代社会的重大作用,我们需要重新审视家庭权相关法律理论,并以理论为指导,重构适合社会需要的现代家庭法律制度。Abstract:Family is an important component of the human society and gives full play to the communicative function between citizens and country. Family plays double functions, that is, to safeguard rights of family members and to keep social order. Family right is provided with double attributes of right and power. As individualism is in vogue, the feature of power is being weakened and the feature of right is on the rise in family right. Family runs into serious challenges. To bring family into full play in modern society, we should scan the theory about family rights and reconstruct the system in accordance with social requirements.
-
[1] 凯特·斯丹德利. 家庭法[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004. [2] 苏永钦. 部门宪法[M]. 台北:元照出版有限公司,2006. [3] 杰罗姆·巴伦,托马斯·迪恩斯. 美国宪法概论[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,1995. [4] 威廉·J·古德. 家庭[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,1986. [5] 费安玲. 学说汇纂[M]. 北京:知识产权出版社,2007. [6] 凯特·斯丹德利. 家庭法[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004. [7] 李震山. 多元、宽容与人权保障——以宪法未列举权之保障为中心[M]. 北京:元照出版公司,2005. [8] 凯特·斯丹德利. 家庭法[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004. [9] 杨明,张伟. 个人主义:西方文化的核心价值观[J]. 南京社会科学,2007,17(4):39. [10] 考夫曼. 法律哲学[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2004. -
![WeChat](http://www.frunetbio.com/journal/fileBJLGDXXBSKB/journal/article/bjlgdxxbshkxb/2011/1/PIC/wechat_cn_20110121.jpg)
计量
- 文章访问数:882
- HTML全文浏览量:2
- PDF下载量:201
- 被引次数:0