关系冲突影响团队产出的中介机制研究

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

陈振娇^1,,
赵定涛²

1.
bob手机在线登陆　管理与经济学院,　北京　100081
2.
中国科学技术大学　管理学院,　合肥　230069

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（71002101）;bob手机在线登陆优秀青年教师资助计划及扩展项目（2009Y1319）;bob手机在线登陆基础研究基金资助项目（2142018）

An Empirical Study of the Mediating Process of the Influence of Conflicts on Team Outcome

CHEN Zhenjiao^1,,
ZHAO Dingtao²

1.
School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing　100081
2.
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230069

摘要:由于团队成员个体差异，成员之间必然存在关系冲突且对团队产出有负面影响；但关系冲突影响团队产出的中介过程还有待研究。基于交互式记忆系统（Transactive memory system）理论建立研究模型，探索交互式记忆系统在关系冲突与团队产出关系中的中介作用。通过三轮纵截面问卷调查，在全国6个行业中收集了76个团队样本。实证研究认为：关系冲突对交互式记忆系统、团队绩效与团队学习产生直接负面影响。交互式记忆系统在关系冲突对团队绩效与团队学习的影响中起部分中介作用。
- 关系冲突/
- 交互式记忆系统/
- 团队绩效/
- 团队学习
Abstract:In work teams, conflicts among team members are unavoidable and have negative effects on team outcomes. However, the mediating processes through which the influence of these conflicts on team outcomes can be measured has received little attention in previous studies. Based on transactive memory system, this study establishes a theoretical model to show how relationship conflicts affect two team outcomes including team performance and team learning through transactive memory system. Three longitudinal studies were conducted and a sample of 76 teams was collected from six companies of six industries in China. Results show that relationship conflicts have negative effects on transactive memory system, team performance and team learning. Moreover, transactive memory system partially mediates the effects of relationship conflicts on team performance and team learning.
- relationship conflict/
- transactive memory system/
- team performance/
- team learning

[2] De Dreu C K W,Weingart L R. Task versus relationship conflict,team performance,and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2003,88:741-749.
[2]	De Dreu C K W,Van Vianen A E M. Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2001,22:309-328.
[3] 郎淳刚,席酉民,郭士伊.团队内冲突对团队决策质量和满意度影响的实证研究[J].管理评论,2007,19(7):10-16.
[4] Jehn K A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1995,40:256-282.
[5]	Pelled L H. Demographic diversity conflict,and work group outcomes: an intervening process theory[J]. Organization Science,1995,6:615-631.
[6] Staw B M,Sanderlands L E,Dutton J E.　Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: a multilevel analysis[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1981,26: 501-524.
[7] Lewis K. Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: a longitudinal study of TMSs[J]. Management Science,2004,50:1519-1533.
[8] Akgün A E,Byrne J C,Keskin H,Lynn G S.　Transactive memory system in new product development teams[J]. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management,2006,53: 95-112.
[9] Lewis K,Lange D,Gillis L. Transactive memory systems,learning,and learning transfer[J]. Organization Science,2005,16: 581-598.
[10] Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44: 350-383.
[11] Baron R A. Positive effects of conflict: a cognitive perspective[J]. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal,1991,4: 25-36.
[12] Wegner D M,Erber R,Raymond P. Transactive memory in close relationships[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1991,61:923-929.
[13] Moreland R L. Transactive memory: learning who knows what in work groups and organizations[C]// In L Thompson,D Messick & J　Levine (Eds.).　Sharing knowledge in organizations: The management of knowledge. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum,1999.
[14] Pearsall M J,Ellis A P J. The effects of critical team member assertiveness on team performance and satisfaction[J]. Journal of Management,2006,32: 575-594
[15] Zhang Z X,Hempel P S,Han Y L,Tjosvold D.Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2007,92: 1722-1730.
[16] Austin J R.Transactive memory in organization groups: the effects of content,consensus,specialization,and accuracy on group performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2003,88: 866-878.
[17] Liao H,Rupp D E.The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: a cross-level multifoci framework[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2005,90: 242-256.
[18] Podsakoff P M,MacKenzie S B,Lee J Y,Podsakoff N P.Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2003,88: 879-903.
[19] Goodman J S, BlumT C. Assessing the non-random sampling effects of subject attrition in longitudinal research[J]. Journal of Management,1996,22: 627-652.
[20] Maxwell B.Translation and cultural adaption of the survey instruments[C]//In M O Martin & D L Kelley (Eds.)　Third international mathematics and science study(TIMSS) technical report,volume I: design and development. Chestnut Hill: MA: Boston college,1996.
[21] Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2003,88: 587-604.
[22] De Dreu C K W.Cooperative outcome interdependence,task reflexivity,and team effectiveness: a motivated information processing perspective[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2007,92: 628-638.
[23] Nunnally J C. Psychometric theory[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill,1978.
[24] Bliese P D. Within-group agreement,non-independence,and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis[C]//In K J Klein & S W Kozlowski(Eds.). Multilevel theory,research and methods in organizations: Foundations,extensions and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,2000.
[25] Glick W H. Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: pitfalls in multilevel research[J]. Academy of Management Review,1985,10: 601-616.
[26] Chen G,Mathieu J E,Bliese P D. A framework for conducting multilevel construct validation[C]// In F J Dansereau & F Yammarino (Eds.).Research multi-level issues: the many faces of multi-level issues. Oxford UK: Elsevier Science,2002.
[27] Baron R A,Kenny D A.The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual,strategic,and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,51: 1173-1182.
[28] Erickson B H,Nosanchuk T A. Understanding data[M]. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson,1977.
[29] 黄光国.　面子:中国人的权力游戏[M].　北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
[30] Whetten D A.What constitutes a theoretical contribution?[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1989,14:490-495.
[31] Stewart G L,Barrick M R.Team structure and performance: assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43: 135-148.

[1]	贾娟娟, 李健.投资视野下战略性企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(3): 168-180.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.2885
[2]	冯国莉, 郝生跃, 李晓光.PPP项目中公共部门关系取向对项目绩效的影响研究——基于项目治理的中介作用. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, (): -.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.0029
[3]	张秀东, 王基铭.大型石化项目风险管理与项目绩效的关系. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(1): 41-52.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.4671
[4]	居佳, 郝生跃, Chimay J. Anumba, 任旭.从“心动”到“行动”——机会与能力在项目团队知识转移中的作用. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(3): 111-123.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1661
[5]	邝宏达, 李林英.高校重大科研项目团队积极科研训练环境的构成要素. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (6): 177-185.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1113
[6]	陆云泉, 许爽, 刘平青.协同创新网络与组织创新绩效的关系. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (5): 63-71.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.2608
[7]	谢晖, 孙永河, 段万春, 许成磊.基于界面管理的创新团队资源配置整合优化模型. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (5): 72-79.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.2058
[8]	尹贻林, 徐志超.工程项目中信任、合作与项目管理绩效的关系——基于关系治理视角. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2014, (6): 41-51.
[9]	丁栋虹, 张翔.国内团队企业家精神研究评述——基于文献分析法. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (1): 63-70.
[10]	张瑾.组织公正的中介效应——高校管理团队冲突与组织公民行为的关系. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (6): 157-165.
[11]	李秋高.团队竞选制：基层民主实践中新的选举模式. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (4): 130-134.
[12]	赵延昇, 赵有靠.高绩效工作系统与企业绩效——中国金融业的实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2010, (5): 39-43.
[13]	倪渊, 林健.基于结构方程模型研发团队绩效评价体系研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2010, (5): 59-63.
[14]	徐辉, 李录堂.农村专业技术协会人力资本团队形成影响因素分析——基于湖北省5市(县)176户农户的调查数据. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2009, (2): 69-72.
[15]	黄瑾.高校科研团队可持续发展与建设初探. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2009, (5): 138-141.
[16]	杨钊, 陈士俊.知识管理视角下软件开发团队的信任机制研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2008, (6): 62-66.
[17]	李建设, 柏林.高新技术企业科研团队效能研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2008, (5): 97-99.
[18]	杜纲, 王建忠, 谢琳.基于模糊集理论的医院员工弹性绩效评价系统. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2007, (6): 39-42.
[19]	孟凡臣, 刘南, M Steppler.中外跨文化团队合作的成功因素分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2006, (3): 21-25.
[20]	王帆, 杨成.情绪与在线学习. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2004, (5): 17-19.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:1952
HTML全文浏览量:1
PDF下载量:247
被引次数:0

留言板

关系冲突影响团队产出的中介机制研究

An Empirical Study of the Mediating Process of the Influence of Conflicts on Team Outcome

计量

关系冲突影响团队产出的中介机制研究

1. bob手机在线登陆　管理与经济学院,　北京　100081
2. 中国科学技术大学　管理学院,　合肥　230069

English Abstract

An Empirical Study of the Mediating Process of the Influence of Conflicts on Team Outcome

1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing　100081
2. School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230069

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

留言板

关系冲突影响团队产出的中介机制研究

An Empirical Study of the Mediating Process of the Influence of Conflicts on Team Outcome

计量

出版历程

关系冲突影响团队产出的中介机制研究

1. bob手机在线登陆 管理与经济学院, 北京 1000812. 中国科学技术大学 管理学院, 合肥 230069

English Abstract

An Empirical Study of the Mediating Process of the Influence of Conflicts on Team Outcome

1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 1000812. School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230069

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

1. bob手机在线登陆　管理与经济学院,　北京　100081
2. 中国科学技术大学　管理学院,　合肥　230069

1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing　100081
2. School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230069