消费者网络购物渠道决策——基于感知价值

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

王崇¹,
刘健²

1.
淮海工学院商学院, 江苏连云港 222000
2.
淮海工学院图书馆, 江苏连云港 222000

基金项目:

江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究基金资助项目(2011SJB630003);国家自然科学基金资助项目(70801022)

Consumer’s Network Channel Decision-Making for Shopping —Basing on Perceived Value

WANG Chong¹,
LIU Jian²

1.
Business School, Huaihai Institute of Technology, Jiangsu Lianyungang 222000, China
2.
Library, Huaihai Institute of Technology, Jiangsu Lianyungang 222000, China

摘要:研究消费者网络渠道决策有助于企业开展协同营销。以感知价值为视角,对消费者网络渠道决策的影响因素进行分析,提出消费者网络渠道决策假设模型,采用结构方程模型方法对样本数据进行拟合分析。分析结果表明:感知价值是影响消费者网络渠道决策的最重要直接因素,与消费者网络渠道购物意愿正相关,感知风险次之,与消费者网络渠道购物意愿负相关。从影响感知价值因素看,感知风险对感知价值的影响程度最高,说明风险仍是目前制约消费者网络购物的最大障碍。此外,消费者的风险态度与网络渠道购物意愿正相关,消费者风险态度越趋向风险型,选择网络渠道的意愿就越强。
- 感知价值/
- 网络渠道/
- 网络购物/
- 感知利益/
- 感知风险/
- 渠道决策
Abstract:Research on consumer’s network channel decision-making contributes to carrying out synergic marketing for enterprise. Taking perceived value as the angle of view,this paper analyses the factors impacting on consumer’s network channel decision-making,and proposes the hypothetic model of consumer making network channel decision. The fitting analysis of sample data is carried out by using structural equation modeling in this paper. The analyzed results are as follows. Perceived value is the most important factor which impacts on consumer to make network channel decision,and is positive relative to consumers’willingness to buy via network channel. Perceived risk is lesser than perceived value and is negative relative to consumers’willingness to buy via network channel. From the point of factors impacting on consumer’s perceived value,perceived risk has the most important effect on perceived value,which reveals the risks are still the most serious obstacle impeding consumer e-shopping currently. In addition,consumer’s risk attitude is positively related to consumers’willingness to buy via network channel,and the more consumers’risk attitude inclines to risk,the stronger consumers’willingness to buy via network channel is.
- perceived value/
- network channel/
- online-shopping/
- perceived benefit/
- perceived risk/
- channel decision-making

[1]	Boyaci T. Competitive stocking and coordination m a multiple-channel distribution system[J]. IIE Trans,2005(37):407-427.
[2]	郭亚军,赵礼强. 基于电子市场的双渠道冲突与协调[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2008(9):59-70.
[3]	Cattani K,Gilland W,Heese S,et al. Boiling frogs: pricing strategies for a manufacturers adding an internet channel[J]. Production and Operations Management,2006,15(1):40-56.
[4]	陈云,王浣尘,沈惠璋. 电子商务零售商与传统零售商的价格竞争研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(1):35-41.
[5]	Alptekinoglu A,Tang C S. A model for analyzing multichannel distribution systems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2005,163(3):802-824.
[6]	熊中楷,李根道,唐彦昌,李薇. 网络环境下考虑动态定价的渠道协调问题研究[J]. 管理工程学报,2007,21(3):49-56.
[7]	Filipe Coelho,Chris Easingwood. A model of the antecedents of multiple channel usage[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,2008(15):32-41.
[8]	王颖,王方华. 企业多渠道营销网络的冲突与治理[J]. 价格理论与实践,2008,4: 60-62.
[9]	Zeithaml Valerie A. Consumer perceptions of price,quality,and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence[J]. Journal of marketing,1988,52(3):2-22.
[10]	Wood Charies M. Scheer,Lisa K incorporating perceived risk into model of consumer deal assessment and purchase intent. Advances in consumer research[J].1996,23(1):399-404.
[11]	Arun Sharma,Anuj Mehrotra. Choosing an optimal channel mix in multichannel environments[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2007(36):21-28.
[12]	Khai Sheang Lee,Soo Jiuan Tan. E-retailing versus physical retailing:A theoretical model and empirical test of consumer choice[J]. Journal of Business Research,2003(56):877-885.
[13]	Nena Lim. Consumers’perceived risk:sources versus consequences[J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications,2006:(2):216-228.
[14]	Anderson J C,Jain C,Chintaguntel P K. Customer value assessment in business markets[J]. Journal of B2B Marketing,1993,1 (1):3-30.
[15]	Alok Gupta,Bo-chiuan Su,Zhiping Walter. Risk profile and consumer shopping behavior in electronic and traditional channels[J]. Decision Support Systems,2004(38):347-367.
[16]	Taylor J W. The role of risk in consumer behavior[J]. Journal of Marketing,1974,38(2):54-60.
[17]	Peter J P,Tarpey L. A comparative analysis of three consumer decision strategies[J]. Journal of Consumer Research,1975,2 (1):29-37.
[18]	Peterson,Robert A. A meta-analysis of cronbach;s coeffcient alpha[J]. Journal of Consumer Research,1994,21(2):381-391.
[19]	马庆国. 管理统计[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2002.
[20]	Xiao Liu,Kwok Kee Wei. An empirical study of product differences in consumers’ e-commerce adoption behavior[J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications,2003(2):229-239.

[1]	孙凤芝, 贾衍菊.旅游社区居民感知视角下政府信任影响因素——社会交换理论的解释. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(4): 90-99.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.6643
[2]	王晓楠, 周林意.新媒体影响力对雾霾风险感知的作用机制. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(2): 41-49.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.3290
[3]	杨贤传, 张磊.媒体说服形塑与城市居民绿色购买行为——调节中介效应检验. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(3): 14-25.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1847
[4]	严玲, 刘柳, 曾诚.合同风险分担条款对承包人公平感知的影响——基于多元参照点的实验研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (2): 67-77.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1319
[5]	吴双, 闫强, 周依群.电子口碑平台对感知可信度及购买意愿的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (5): 72-81.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.2037
[6]	贺明华, 梁晓蓓, 肖琳.共享经济监管机制对感知隐私风险、消费者信任及持续共享意愿的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (6): 55-64.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.3713
[7]	马宝龙, 权级慧, 王逸仁, 李晓飞.忠诚计划服务质量对顾客忠诚的影响机制——基于零售业的实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (3): 67-74,107.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1408
[8]	史容, 殷红春, 魏亚平.创业机会感知与创业动机对创业意向的影响——基于潜在科技型创业者的中介效应模型. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (5): 105-110.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0514
[9]	成岳鹏, 李波, 李庆华.电子零售商和供应商的最优库存及渠道选择决策. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (2): 71-78.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0212
[10]	王丽丽.信息一致性视角下媒体报道对风险感知的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (6): 153-158.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0621
[11]	王仙雅, 毛文娟.消费者对企业社会责任缺失行为的感知——消费者归因和期望的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (6): 74-80,112.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0610
[12]	王秀村, 饶晨.虚拟品牌社区中顾客感知支持构成与作用机制. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (6): 99-105.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0613
[13]	周海云, 杜纲, 安彤.回收条例约束下双渠道营销闭环供应链的决策与协调. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2014, (5): 65-70,76.
[14]	薛永基, 杨志坚, 李健.慈善捐赠行为对企业品牌资产的影响——企业声誉与风险感知的中介效应. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (4): 58-66.
[15]	张圣亮, 王爱霞.网上银行顾客感知服务质量影响因素研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2011, (1): 59-63,72.
[16]	翟杰全.技术传播：概念、渠道和企业实践. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2010, (1): 90-94.
[17]	张圣亮, 赵芳芳.顾客关系对感知损失、情绪和补救期望的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2010, (3): 54-60.
[18]	赵静娴, 杜子平.基于神经网络和决策树相结合的信用风险评估模型研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2009, (1): 76-79.
[19]	孙曙迎.消费者网络信息可信度感知影响因素的实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2008, (6): 50-54.
[20]	王树国, 乔兆华, 吕莹.财务报表网络化对决策的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2005, (1): 61-62.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:1304
HTML全文浏览量:1
PDF下载量:155
被引次数:0

留言板

消费者网络购物渠道决策——基于感知价值

Consumer’s Network Channel Decision-Making for Shopping —Basing on Perceived Value

计量

消费者网络购物渠道决策——基于感知价值

1. 淮海工学院商学院, 江苏连云港 222000
2. 淮海工学院图书馆, 江苏连云港 222000

English Abstract

Consumer’s Network Channel Decision-Making for Shopping —Basing on Perceived Value

1. Business School, Huaihai Institute of Technology, Jiangsu Lianyungang 222000, China
2. Library, Huaihai Institute of Technology, Jiangsu Lianyungang 222000, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

留言板

消费者网络购物渠道决策——基于感知价值

Consumer’s Network Channel Decision-Making for Shopping —Basing on Perceived Value

计量

出版历程

消费者网络购物渠道决策——基于感知价值

1. 淮海工学院 商学院, 江苏 连云港 2220002. 淮海工学院 图书馆, 江苏 连云港 222000

English Abstract

Consumer’s Network Channel Decision-Making for Shopping —Basing on Perceived Value

1. Business School, Huaihai Institute of Technology, Jiangsu Lianyungang 222000, China2. Library, Huaihai Institute of Technology, Jiangsu Lianyungang 222000, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

1. 淮海工学院商学院, 江苏连云港 222000
2. 淮海工学院图书馆, 江苏连云港 222000

1. Business School, Huaihai Institute of Technology, Jiangsu Lianyungang 222000, China
2. Library, Huaihai Institute of Technology, Jiangsu Lianyungang 222000, China