基于SEM的电力企业人本安全管理效能研究
Study on Humanism Safety Management of Electric Power Enterprises Based on SEM
-
摘要:从人本安全管理视角出发, 通过压力的桥梁效应作用于安全效能的假设, 进一步研究人本安全管理对电力企业安全管理效能提升的作用。采用结构方程模型(SEM), 对北京、云南、江苏、河北等地的8家电力企业生产一线的操作员工与基层管理者进行问卷调查采集的数据进行关联分析, 研究电力企业管理中的安全制度、培训教育、沟通机制、心理疏导等因素对安全效能的影响。实证分析表明:操作压力、安全管理压力与压力认知在人本安全管理与安全效能之间起到了桥梁作用, 其中心理疏导因子影响水平最为显著。研究结果表明, 电力企业组织坚持开展人本安全管理的相关措施有助于提升安全效能。建议从改善工作氛围、提升员工压力防控能力、优化企业制度等方面采取措施进一步提升安全效能。Abstract:In order to improve the effectiveness of safety management in the enterprises, a study of how the “human-oriented” management affects safety performance is conducted. From the perspectives of management, a hypothesis relation between “human-oriented” management and safety performance is established through work stress as an intermediary benefit to explain the relevant impacts. Data were obtained from a survey among workers at the production line and at the basic level in eight electricity enterprises in Beijing, Yunnan, Jiangsu and Hebei. Four factors’(safety institution, training and education, communication system, psychology counseling effects) on safety performance were studied by using the SEM. Empirical analysis shows that: the operation stress, safety management stress and stress recognition connect “human-oriented” management and safety performance as a bridge; psychological counseling stands out most. The result of the study shows that “human-oriented” management is beneficial to boost enterprise safety performance. It is advised that efforts be made to promote safety performance in the areas of improving work atmosphere, advancing employees’capability of stress management, and optimizing enterprise policies.
-
[1] Heinrich H W. Industrial accident prevention: a scientific approach[M]. New York: McGraw Hill, 1931:124-137. [2] 阳富强, 吴超, 望发松. 1998—2008年人因可靠性研究进展[J]. 科技导报, 2009, 27(8):87-88. [3] 冯杰, 罗云, 曾珠. 特种设备安全绩效与安全监管能力相关性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(2):170-177. [4] 刘霁, 李云, 刘浪. 基于SEM的建筑施工企业KPI安全绩效评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 16(6):123-129. [5] Diaz R I, Cabrera D D. Safety climate and attitude as evaluation measures of organization safety[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1997, 29(5):643-650. [6] Cox S, Flin R. Safety culture: philosophers' stone or man of straw?[J]. Work and Stress, 1998, 12(3):189-201. [7] Barling J, Loughlin C, Kelloway K. Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87(3): 488-496. [8] Seawand B L. Managing stress: principles and strategies for health and well-being[M]. Miami: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2011: 117-223. [9] Hollnagel E.Cognitive reliability and error analysis method[M]. Oxford (UK):Elsevier Science Ltd., 1998: 97-102. [10] 李润民. 论人本管理[J]. 合作经济与科技, 2012, 13(7):62-63. [11] 高文宇, 张力. 人因可靠性分析方法CREAM及其应用研究[J]. 人类工效学, 2002, 12(4):8-12. [12] 武淑萍, 宋守信. 企业安全生产系统人因失误的可修正性分析[J]. 南华大学学报:社会科学版, 2007, 8(6):43-36. [13] Neal A, Griffin M A, Hart P M. The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior[J]. Safety Science, 2000, 34(1-3):99-109. [14] Nunnally J C. Psychometric theory (2nd Edition)[M]. New York: McGraw- Hill, 1978:45-87. [15] 傅贵, 王祥尧, 吉洪文. 基于结构方程模型的安全文化影响因子分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(2):9-16. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数:648
- HTML全文浏览量:0
- PDF下载量:12
- 被引次数:0
下载:
