魔术的著作权法保护之思
On the Copyright Law Protection of Magic
-
摘要:通过考察作品的构成要件以及著作权法列举的作品类型,可以发现有些魔术具备作品的要件,且魔术等杂技艺术有别于音乐、舞蹈艺术,可以构成一种独立的作品。魔术虽然可以成为作品,但从思想、表达相区分原则出发,著作权法的保护并不延及魔术中包含的各种元素,唯有对魔术表演的动作、语言、表情等形成的艺术性表达才属于著作权法的保护范围。揭秘他人魔术的行为由于只利用了魔术中属于思想的部分而不会侵犯著作权。模仿他人魔术的行为并非均属于侵权行为,而是有可能构成合理使用。要充分发挥著作权法在保护魔术方面的作用,需完善我国的相关邻接权制度。Abstract:By examining the constituent elements and the types of works cited by the copyright law, we can find that some works of magic comply with their general composition elements, and as a form of acrobatic art are different from music art or dancing art which constitute independent kinds of works. However, based on the thoughts/expression dichotomy, the protection of copyright law does not extend to every element of the magic, and only elements like action, language or facial expressions in magic shows are in the scope of protection. Furthermore, the act of exposing others' magic isn't infringing their copyright since it only uses the designing thoughts of the magic. The act of imitating others' magic is not necessarily an infringement, but can constitute a reasonable use. To give full play to the role of copyright law in the protection of magic, we should improve our related neighboring rights system.
-
[1] 李扬. 魔术表演受知识产权保护吗[J]. 电子知识产权,2002(9):59-60. [2] 王迁. 知识产权法教程[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011:71-73. [3] 雷炳德M. 著作权法[M]. 张恩民,译.北京:法律出版社,2004:117. [4] 李明德,许超. 著作权法[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2003:38. [5] 沈娟. 浅谈传统杂技的艺术定位[J]. 杂技与艺术,2003(6):23-24. [6] 董美根. 杂技艺术作品的著作权保护[J]. 杂技与艺术,2008(2):49-51. [7] 吴汉东. 著作权合理使用制度研究[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005:182. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数:995
- HTML全文浏览量:2
- PDF下载量:722
- 被引次数:0
下载:
