基于技术异质性的中日贸易隐含碳测算及分析

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

赵玉焕¹,
王淞¹

1.
bob手机在线登陆管理与经济学院, 北京 100081

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目“金砖五国对外贸易隐含碳测算及我国对策研究”（71273026）

The Calculation and Analysis of Embodied Carbon in China-Japan Trade：Based on the Technical Heterogeneity Assumption

ZHAO Yuhuan¹,
WANG Song¹

1.
School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

摘要:基于中日技术异质性，使用多区域投入产出模型（MRIO），利用WIOD数据库非竞争型投入产出表，对1995—2009年中日贸易隐含碳进行了测算，测算中考虑了工业生产过程碳排放和能源消耗碳排放。同时，采用SDA分析，对中日贸易隐含碳的变化进行了因素分解。测算结果表明：从1995—2009年，在中日贸易中，中国出口隐含碳从40.78Mt增长到152.78Mt，进口隐含碳从12.25Mt增长到66.87Mt，净出口隐含碳从28.53Mt增长到85.91Mt。因素分解结果表明：在1995—2009年期间，对于中国对日本出口隐含碳的变化，规模效应促使了隐含碳的增长，技术效应促使了隐含碳减少，结构效应影响比较小。
- 技术异质性/
- 中日贸易/
- 隐含碳/
- 投入产出法/
- SDA分析
Abstract:By using the technical heterogeneity assumption and non-competitive input-output tables extracted from WIOD database, this article estimates the embodied carbon in China-Japan trade during 1995—2009,which is generated from energy consumption and industrial production process, with a multi-region input-output model. Furthermore,by employing the structure decomposition analysis(SDA)approach, this article analyzes the driving forces of embodied carbon in exports from China to Japan during 1995—2009. The result shows that, in trade with Japan, the embodied carbon in China's exports increased from 40.78Mt to 152.78Mt, the embodied carbon in China's imports increased from 12.25Mt to 66.87Mt, and the net embodied carbon exports increased from 28.53Mt to 85.91Mt. With SDA analysis, this article also finds that the scale effect had a large influence on the increase of carbon embodied in China's exports, and the technical effect is the primary cause in the decreasing of embodied carbon, while the influence of the structure effect is relatively small.
- technical heterogeneity/
- china-japan trade/
- carbon emissions embodied in trade/
- Input-output analysis/
- structure decomposition analysis

[1]	Wyckoff A W, Roop J M. The embodiment of carbon in imports of manufactured products:Implications for international agreements on greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Energy policy, 1994, 22(3):187-194.
[2]	Schaeffer R, De Sá A. The embodiment of carbon associated with Brazilian imports and exports[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 1996, 37(6):955-960.
[3]	Kondo Y, Moriguchi Y, Shimizu H. CO₂emissions in Japan:influences of imports and exports[J]. Applied energy, 1998, 59(2):163-174.
[4]	Munksgaard J, Pedersen K A. CO₂accounts for open economies:producer or consumer responsibility?[J]. Energy policy, 2001, 29(4):327-334.
[5]	Ahmad N, Wyckoff A. Carbon dioxide emissions embodied in international trade of goods[R]. OECD Publishing, 2003.
[6]	Peters G, Davis S, Andrew R. A synthesis of carbon in international trade[J]. Biogeosciences, 2012, 9(8):3247-3276.
[7]	丛晓男, 王铮, 郭晓飞. 全球贸易隐含碳的核算及其地缘结构分析[J]. 财经研究, 2013(1):013.
[8]	Sánchez-Chóliz J, Duarte R. CO₂emissions embodied in international trade:evidence for Spain[J]. Energy Policy, 2004, 32(18):1999-2005.
[9]	Kratena K H, Meyer I. Energy consumption and CO₂emissions in Austria. the role of energy efficiency and fuel substitution[J]. WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), 2007, 80(11):893-907.
[10]	Dietzenbacher E, Pei J, Yang C. Trade, production fragmentation, and China's carbon dioxide emissions[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2012.
[11]	Su B, Ang B. Input-output analysis of CO₂emissions embodied in trade:Competitive versus non-competitive imports[J]. Energy Policy, 2013.
[12]	Shui B, Harriss R C. The role of CO₂embodiment in US-China trade[J]. Energy policy, 2006, 34(18):4063-4068.
[13]	Xu M, Allenby B, Chen W. Energy and air emissions embodied in China?US trade:eastbound assessment using adjusted bilateral trade data[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2009, 43(9):3378-3384.
[14]	吴英娜, 姚静. 中美进出口贸易中隐含碳的研究——基于贸易污染条件的分析[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2012(12):86-92.
[15]	Li Y, Hewitt C. The effect of trade between China and the UK on national and global carbon dioxide emissions[J]. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(6):1907-1914.
[16]	闫云凤, 赵忠秀, 王苒. 中欧贸易隐含碳及政策启示——基于投入产出模型的实证研究[J]. 财贸研究, 2012, 2:014.
[17]	齐晔, 李惠民, 徐明. 中国进出口贸易中的隐含能估算[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2008, 18(3):69-69.
[18]	Davis S J, Caldeira K. Consumption-based accounting of CO₂emissions[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010, 107(12):5687-5692.
[19]	Yunfeng Y, Laike Y. China's foreign trade and climate change:a case study of CO₂emissions[J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(1):350-356.
[20]	Du X, Dong F, Hayes D J, et al. Assessment of environmental impacts embodied in US-China and US-India trade and related climate change policies[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2011, 93(2):537-544.
[21]	Liu X, Ishikawa M, Wang C, et al. Analyses of CO₂emissions embodied in Japan-China trade[J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(3):1510-1518.
[22]	Dong Y, Ishikawa M, Liu X, et al. An analysis of the driving forces of CO₂emissions embodied in Japan-China trade[J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(11):6784-6792.
[23]	王菲, 李娟. 中国对日本出口贸易中的隐含碳排放及结构分解分析[J]. 经济经纬, 2012, 4:016.
[24]	Ipcc. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories[R]. IGES, Japan, 2006.
[25]	张晓平. 中国对外贸易产生的 CO₂排放区位转移分析[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(2):234-242.
[26]	陈红敏. 包含工业生产过程碳排放的产业部门隐含碳研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2009, 19(3).
[27]	沈利生, 吴振宇. 出口对中国 GDP 增长的贡献[J]. 经济研究, 2003, 11:33-41.
[28]	Lenzen M, Pade L-L, Munksgaard J. CO₂multipliers in multi-region input-output models[J]. Economic Systems Research, 2004, 16(4):391-412.
[29]	Peters G P, Hertwich E G. Pollution embodied in trade:the norwegian case[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(4):379-387.
[30]	Turner K, Lenzen M, Wiedmann T, et al. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities—Part 1:a technical note on combining input-output and ecological footprint analysis[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 62(1):37-44.
[31]	Wiedmann T. A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 69(2):211-222.
[32]	WIOD. The world input output database[EB/OL]. (2012-10-01)[2013-05-11]. htttp://www.wiod.org/database/index.htm.
[33]	郭朝先. 中国二氧化碳排放增长因素分析——基于SDA分解技术[J]. 中国工业经济, 2010, 12:47-56.
[34]	李景华. SDA 模型的加权平均分解法及在中国第三产业经济发展分析中的应用[J]. 系统工程, 2004, 9(265):69-73.
[35]	张华初. 中国就业结构演变的 SDA 分析[J]. 中国人口科学, 2008(2):42-49.
[36]	Dietzenbacher E, Los B. Structural decomposition techniques:sense and sensitivity[J]. Economic Systems Research, 1998, 10(4):307-324.
[37]	Grossman G M, Krueger A B. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1991.

[1]	张平淡, 屠西伟.制造业集聚与雾霾：基于能源消费的异质性分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(6): 30-40.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.0871
[2]	曹玉平.异质技术创新对中国加工贸易升级的差异影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(5): 101-114.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.5832
[3]	郎丽华, 李雪亚.空间集聚对制造业出口的非线性影响及其异质性分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(1): 89-98.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.4085
[4]	屈小娥, 胡琰欣, 赵昱钧.产业集聚对制造业绿色全要素生产率的影响——基于长短期行业异质性视角的经验分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (1): 27-36.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.5632
[5]	尹建华, 王森, 张玲玲.制度同构下企业环境战略的异质性响应——来自重污染行业上市公司社会责任报告的经验分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (4): 47-55.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1985
[6]	赵领娣, 徐乐.投入产出视角下工业技术创新的环境规制协同效应. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (4): 1-12.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.2596
[7]	张先锋, 申屠瑶, 王俊凯.环境规制、企业异质性与企业退出. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (4): 43-49.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.2384
[8]	鄢哲明, 邓晓兰, 杨志明.异质性技术创新对碳强度的影响——基于全球专利数据. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (1): 20-27.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0103
[9]	马晓微, 叶奕, 杜佳, 李晗箏.基于投入产出中美居民生活消费间接碳排放研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (1): 24-29.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0104
[10]	汪克亮, 孟祥瑞, 杨力, 程云鹤.生产技术异质性与区域绿色全要素生产率增长——基于共同前沿与2000-2012年中国省际面板数据的分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (1): 23-31.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0104
[11]	赵玉焕, 王邵军.基于垂直专业化的中国对外贸易隐含碳研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (3): 23-30.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0304
[12]	廖华, 高亿萱, 何凌云.人民币汇率变动对国内物价的传导研究——基于投入产出时间序列表的分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (3): 83-91.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0312
[13]	范丽伟, 潘晨, 赵锡波.出口贸易隐含碳变化驱动因素分析模型及应用. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2014, (6): 34-40.
[14]	唐葆君, 申程.碳市场风险及预期收益——欧盟排放贸易体系与清洁发展机制的比较分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (1): 12-18.
[15]	张华明, 赵国浩, 靳然.中国能源价格与相关产业价格影响机制实证分析——基于投入产出价格模型. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (3): 32-38.
[16]	闾浩, 周德群, 周鹏.基于能源投入产出分析的节能减排政策研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (4): 34-41.
[17]	曲虹, 高伟涛.数据包络分析方法在研究生教育投入产出效率评价中的应用. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2009, (6): 26-30.
[18]	骆珣, 邹凌.大中型企业新产品产出与科技投入灰关联分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2006, (1): 44-48.
[19]	曲大成, 高茵, 高世桥.高校投入产出效益与内部控制. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2006, (2): 113-117.
[20]	崔卫国.学习投入与产出的经济学分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2000, (4): 76-78.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:733
HTML全文浏览量:0
PDF下载量:672
被引次数:0

留言板

基于技术异质性的中日贸易隐含碳测算及分析

The Calculation and Analysis of Embodied Carbon in China-Japan Trade：Based on the Technical Heterogeneity Assumption

计量

基于技术异质性的中日贸易隐含碳测算及分析

1. bob手机在线登陆管理与经济学院, 北京 100081

English Abstract

The Calculation and Analysis of Embodied Carbon in China-Japan Trade：Based on the Technical Heterogeneity Assumption

1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

留言板

基于技术异质性的中日贸易隐含碳测算及分析

The Calculation and Analysis of Embodied Carbon in China-Japan Trade：Based on the Technical Heterogeneity Assumption

计量

出版历程

基于技术异质性的中日贸易隐含碳测算及分析

1. bob手机在线登陆 管理与经济学院, 北京 100081

English Abstract

The Calculation and Analysis of Embodied Carbon in China-Japan Trade：Based on the Technical Heterogeneity Assumption

1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

1. bob手机在线登陆管理与经济学院, 北京 100081