留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

仁慈型领导如何激发员工创造力?——社会认同与社会交换整合视角

蒋琬,顾琴轩

downloadPDF
蒋琬, 顾琴轩. 仁慈型领导如何激发员工创造力?——社会认同与社会交换整合视角[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2015, (1): 70-77. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0110
引用本文: 蒋琬, 顾琴轩. 仁慈型领导如何激发员工创造力?——社会认同与社会交换整合视角[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2015, (1): 70-77.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0110
JIANG Wan, GU Qinxuan. How does Benevolent Leadership Lead to Employee Creativity?-The Integration Perspective of Social Identification and Social Exchange Theory[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2015, (1): 70-77. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0110
Citation: JIANG Wan, GU Qinxuan. How does Benevolent Leadership Lead to Employee Creativity?-The Integration Perspective of Social Identification and Social Exchange Theory[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2015, (1): 70-77.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0110

仁慈型领导如何激发员工创造力?——社会认同与社会交换整合视角

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0110
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金重点项目"组织文化与组织创造力研究-基于组织的二元情境视角"(71032203)

How does Benevolent Leadership Lead to Employee Creativity?-The Integration Perspective of Social Identification and Social Exchange Theory

  • 摘要:整合社会认同和社会交换视角,构建仁慈型领导影响员工创造力作用机制模型.基于员工与领导配对调查的实证研究发现:仁慈型领导促进员工对领导认同,进而提升领导与员工的交换关系;员工对领导认同通过领导-成员交换影响员工创造力;员工对领导认同与领导-成员交换在仁慈型领导与员工创造力之间发挥顺序中介效用.
  • [1] 陈璐,杨百寅,井润田,王国锋. 家长式领导,冲突与高管团队战略决策效果的关系研究[J]. 南开管理评论,2010,13(5):4-11.
    [2] 田在兰,黄培伦. 差序式领导理论的发展脉络及与其他领导行为的对比研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2013,34(4):150-157.
    [3] Farh J,Liang J,Chou L,Cheng B.Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations:research progress and future research directions[M]. UK:Cambridge University Press,2008.
    [4] Liang S K,Ling H C,Hsieh S Y. The mediating effects of leader-member exchange quality to influence the relationships between paternalistic leadership and organizational citizenship behaviors[J]. Journal of American Academy of Business,2007,10(2):127-137.
    [5] 韩翼,杨百寅. 真实型领导,心理资本与员工创新行为:领导成员交换的调节作用[J]. 管理世界,2012(12):78-86.
    [6] Shalley C E,Gilson L L.What leaders need to know:a review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2004,15(1):33-53.
    [7] Tierney P,Farmer S M,Graen G B.An examination of leadership and employee creativity:the relevance of traits and relationships[J]. Personnel Psychology,2006,52(3):591-620.
    [8] Wang A C,Cheng B S. When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity?the moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2010,31(1):106-121.
    [9] 陈璐. CEO家长式领导行为对高管团队决策效果的影响机制研究[D]. 成都:电子科技大学,2011.
    [10] Cheng B S,Chou L F,Wu T Y,Huang M P,Farh J L. Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses:establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations[J]. Asian Journal of Social Psychology,2004,7(1):89-117.
    [11] Farh J L,Cheng B S. Management and organizations in the Chinese context[M]. London:Macmillan,2000:94-127.
    [12] 周浩,龙立荣. 恩威并施,以德服人——家长式领导研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展,2005,13(2):227-238.
    [13] Redding S G. The spirit of Chinese capitalism[M]. Berlin:Walter de Gruyter,1990.
    [14] Deci E L,Ryan R M.The support of autonomy and the control of behavior[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1987,53(6):1024-1037.
    [15] Chen Y F,Tjosvold D.Participative leadership by American and Chinese managers in China:the role of relationships[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2006,43(8):1727-1752.
    [16] 高莹. 中国情景下辱虐管理对员工职场偏差行为的影响研究[D]. 长沙:中南大学,2010.
    [17] 郑伯埙. 差序格局与华人组织行为[J]. 本土心理学研究,1995(3):142-219.
    [18] 郑美群. 管理学(第二版)[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
    [19] Sluss D M,Ashforth B E. Relational identity and identification:defining ourselves through work relationships[J]. Academy of Management Review,2007,32(1):9-32.
    [20] Walumbwa F O,Wang P,Wang H,Schaubroeck J,Avolio B J. Psychological processes linking authentic leadership to follower behaviors[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2010,21(5):901-914.
    [21] Graf M M,Schuh S C,Van Quaquebeke N,Van Dick R.The relationship between leaders'group-oriented values and follower identification with and endorsement of leaders:the moderating role of leaders'group membership[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2012,106(3):301-311.
    [22] Shamir B,House R J,Arthur M B.The motivational effects of charismatic leadership:A self-concept based theory[J]. Organization Science,1993,4(4):577-594.
    [23] Lapidot Y,Kark R,Shamir B. The impact of situational vulnerability on the development and erosion of followers'trust in their leader[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2007,18(1):16-34.
    [24] Liu W,Zhu R,Yang Y. I warn you because I like you:voice behavior,employee identifications,and transformational leadership[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2010,21(1):189-202.
    [25] Wang P,Rode J C. Transformational leadership and follower creativity:the moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate[J]. Human Relations,2010,63(8):1105-1128.
    [26] Wu M,Huang X,Li C,Liu W. Perceived interactional justice and trust in supervisor as mediators for paternalistic leadership[J]. Management and Organization Review,2012,8(1):97-121.
    [27] Sparrowe R T,Liden R C. Process and structure in leader-member exchange[J]. Academy of Management Review,1997,22(2):522-552.
    [28] Cropanzano R,Mitchell M S. Social exchange theory:an interdisciplinary review[J]. Journal of Management,2005,31(6):874-900.
    [29] Dienesch R M,Liden R C. Leader-member exchange model of leadership:a critique and further development[J]. Academy of Management Review,1986,11(3):618-634.
    [30] Wang H,Law K S,Hackett R D,Wang D X,Chen Z X. Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers'performance and organizational citizenship behavior[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2005,48(3):420-432.
    [31] Pratt M G. To be or not to be?central questions in organizational identification[M]. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage,1998:171-207.
    [32] Dasborough M T,Ashkanasy N M. Emotion and attribution of intentionality in leader-member relationships[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2002,13(5):615-634.
    [33] 谢俊,储小平,汪林. 效忠主管与员工工作绩效的关系:反馈寻求行为和权力距离的影响[J]. 南开管理评论,2012(2):31-38.
    [34] Chen Z X,Tsui A S,Farh J L. Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment:relationships to employee performance in China[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,2002,75(3):339-356.
    [35] Walumbwa F O,Cropanzano R,Hartnell C A. Organizational jus杴敩?慥測?敯浬灵楮牴楡捲慹氠?慥獡獲敮獩獮浧攠湢瑥?瑡桶物潯畲本桡?獤挠慪汯敢?摰敥癲敦汯潲灭浡敮湣瑥嬺?崠???潴甠牯湦愠汴?潥映??慤湩慡杴敩浮敧渠瑥??????㈠??ㄠ?????????扡牴?孯??嵡?婤栠潬略????攭潭牥杭敢??????坨桡敮湧?橛潊扝?搠楊獯獵慲瑮楡獬映慯捦琠楏潲湧?汮敩慺摡獴?瑯潮?捬爠敂慥瑨楡癶楩瑯祲?攲渰挰漹甬爳愰木椸温机?琱栰攳?攱砱瀲父攮猼獢楲漾湛″漶晝?癌潩楤捥敮嬠?崠???捲慡摥敮洠祇?潇晥??慲湡慬杩敺浡敢湩瑬??潹甠牯湦愠汴???ぶ?????????????????扡牧?嬠??嵤??渠摯敦爠獬潥湡??????数牛扊楝渮朠???坤??卹琠牯畦挠瑍畡牮慡汧?敭煥畮慴琠楊潯湵?浮潡摬攬氱椹游朰?椲渳?瀳爩愺挴琵椱挭攴?愵?爼敢癲椾敛眳?慝渠摃?牥敵据潧洠浍攠湆搠教搬?瑵眠潗?猠瑌敥灡?慥灲瀭牭潥慭换桥孲?嵥??偨獡祮捧桥漠污潮杤椠捥慭汰??畹汥汥攠瑷楯湲?ㄠ?????ね??????????????扦物?孭??嵴?健漠摭獥慤歩潡晴晩?偧???佬牥朠慯湦???坢??卡整汩晳?牡散灴潩牯瑮獛?楝渮?潁牳杩慡渠楐穡慣瑩楦潩湣愠求?牳敩獮敥慳牳挠桒?灶物潥扷氬攲洰猱′愬渱搸?瀱爩漺猶瀵攭挸琱献嬼?嵲???漸畝爠湄慩污?潥映??愠湒慥杬敡浴敩湯瑮?????????????????????扭牢?孲?づ嵸??慡牮潧湥?剱????整湹測祳??????呣桴敩?浮漠摷敩牴慨琠潯牲?浡敮摩楺慡瑴潩牯?癡慬爠楣慯扭汭敵?摩楣獡瑴楩湯据琬楡潮湤?楣湲?獡潴捩楶慩汴?瀠獩祮挠桥潮汴潥杲楴捡慩汮?牥敮獴攠慯牲捧桡?捩潺湡捴敩灯瑮畳慛汍?献琠牁慬瑬敩条楮捴?慌湯摳?獁瑮慧瑥楬獥瑳椺捉慮汴?捲潮湡獴楩摯敮牡慬琠楕潮湩獶孥?嵳???漬甲爰渰愴氮?潢晲 ̄偛攳爹獝漠湙愐氬槳瓑禛?愠湓擤?匠漭揽椁愚沆?倐獘禤换栬濢氟漐杘禤???????ㄛ?????????地?????扝爮?审??崋?傥爬攲愰挰根攬爲″?????愰礹攭猱??????匾偛匴匰?愠湃摨?卮?匠?瀠版漠捄攬摊畯牨敮獳?普漠牒?故献琠楎浯慴琠楡湬杬?楬湥摡楤牥敲挭瑭?敭晢晥敲挠瑥獸?楨湡?獧楥浳瀠污敲?洠散摲楥慡瑴楥潤渠?浱潵摡敬氺獩孭?嵯???敮档慥瘠楯潦爠?剥敡獤敥慲爠捲桥??整瑩桯潮摡獬??つづ?????????ㄠ??????adership Quarterly,2010,21(5):796-808.
    [36] Jackson E M,Johnson R E. When opposites do(and do not) attract:interplay of leader and follower self-identities and its consequences for leader-member exchange[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2012,23(3):488-501.
    [37] Chan S C H,Mak W. Benevolent leadership and follower performance:the mediating role of leader-member exchange(lmx)[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2012,29(2):1-17.
    [38] Cheng B,Chou L,Farh J. A triad model of paternalistic leadership:the constructs and measurement[J]. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies,2000,14(3):3-64.
    [39] Hinkin T R. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires[J]. Organizational Research Methods,1998,1(1):104-121.
    [40] Shamir B,Zakay E,Breinin E,Popper M. Correlations of charismatic leader behavior in military units:subordinates'attitudes, unit characteristics,and superiors'appraisals of leader performace[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1998,41(4):387-409.
    [41] Liden R C,Maslyn J M. Multidimensionafity of leader-member exchan
  • [1] 刘平青, 崔遵康, 赵莉, 刘园园, 杨征.中国情境下精神型领导对研发人员创新行为的影响机理. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(1): 65-76.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.6964
    [2] 孙凤芝, 贾衍菊.旅游社区居民感知视角下政府信任影响因素——社会交换理论的解释. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(4): 90-99.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.6643
    [3] 王晓楠.阶层认同、环境价值观对垃圾分类行为的影响机制. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2019, (3): 57-66.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.2592
    [4] 曾楠.文化情境变迁中政治认同的生成考察. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2017, (5): 156-161.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0939
    [5] 于语和, 吕姝洁.中国传统法律文化与当今的法治认同. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2016, (4): 126-131.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0418
    [6] 董宏.1949-1966:文化领导权之争中的蔡仪美学思想. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2016, (5): 158-164.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0522
    [7] 王永强.社会基本信任形态的社会基础研究. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2013, (4): 129-133,139.
    [8] 陈融.合同自由与等价交换的博弈——英美“约因无须等价”规则研究. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2013, (1): 129-134.
    [9] 杨裕钦.公司社会责任的正当性:功能社会视角. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2012, (4): 47-51.
    [10] 李军锋, 周宁, 马婧, 韩小汀.知识型员工个人元胜任力的测量模型. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2012, (3): 75-81.
    [11] 杨卫东, 李寿平.欧盟及其成员国对民用飞机产业的补贴及其启示. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2011, (2): 88-93.
    [12] 梁朝晖, 龚东升.基于美式交换实物期权的项目估值研究. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2011, (3): 16-20.
    [13] 贾晓明, 雷雨佳.早年被收养大学生自我认同发展的质性研究. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2011, (3): 151-156.
    [14] 吴珂.清代四川地区民间演剧与社区认同. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2010, (4): 114-118.
    [15] 杨亚非.社会·法律·法之理. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2007, (2): 3-7.
    [16] 周云, 彭光芒.人际传播中的信息交换与利益实现. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2005, (4): 18-21.
    [17] 张平淡, 韩伯棠.论公司价值的创造. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2003, (5): 62-64.
    [18] 纪新华.试论领导干部的亲和力. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2003, (1): 73-75.
    [19] 苗建军.三代领导人城市布局思想与政策绩效分析. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2002, (1): 7-10.
    [20] 史树林.世界贸易组织成员义务的产生机制及义务承担. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2000, (1): 9-12.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:905
  • HTML全文浏览量:0
  • PDF下载量:1360
  • 被引次数:0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-29
  • 刊出日期:2015-01-19

仁慈型领导如何激发员工创造力?——社会认同与社会交换整合视角

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0110
    基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金重点项目"组织文化与组织创造力研究-基于组织的二元情境视角"(71032203)

摘要:整合社会认同和社会交换视角,构建仁慈型领导影响员工创造力作用机制模型.基于员工与领导配对调查的实证研究发现:仁慈型领导促进员工对领导认同,进而提升领导与员工的交换关系;员工对领导认同通过领导-成员交换影响员工创造力;员工对领导认同与领导-成员交换在仁慈型领导与员工创造力之间发挥顺序中介效用.

English Abstract

蒋琬, 顾琴轩. 仁慈型领导如何激发员工创造力?——社会认同与社会交换整合视角[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2015, (1): 70-77. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0110
引用本文: 蒋琬, 顾琴轩. 仁慈型领导如何激发员工创造力?——社会认同与社会交换整合视角[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版), 2015, (1): 70-77.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0110
JIANG Wan, GU Qinxuan. How does Benevolent Leadership Lead to Employee Creativity?-The Integration Perspective of Social Identification and Social Exchange Theory[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2015, (1): 70-77. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0110
Citation: JIANG Wan, GU Qinxuan. How does Benevolent Leadership Lead to Employee Creativity?-The Integration Perspective of Social Identification and Social Exchange Theory[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2015, (1): 70-77.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0110
参考文献 (41)

目录

    /

      返回文章
      返回
        Baidu
        map