The Intellectual Property Issues in Open Source Hardware Licensing Agreement—From the View of Three-Dimensional Printing
-
摘要:相对于较为成熟的开放源代码软件运动,开放源代码硬件仍然处于起步阶段。造成这种困境的原因主要是经济成本的阻碍和许可协议的缺失。3D打印技术的发展,为开源硬件运动的发展克服了技术和经济门槛,同时为依据知识产权法律制定许可协议提供了工艺基础。在3D打印环境下,根据专利权或者合同约束制定开源硬件许可协议存在缺陷,而以著作权为基础构建许可协议是可行的。许可协议应当包括授权性条款、义务性条款和免责性条款。著作权制度有必要以此为契机,在应对反向工程、拓展产品设计图复制权保护范围,以及构建新型邻接权等方面做出完善。通过许可协议的合理制定,可以推动3D打印开放源代码硬件运动的发展。Abstract:Comparing to the open software movement, which is more mature, the open source hardware movement remains in its infancy. The main causes of this dilemma are the high economic costs and the lack of licensing agreement. With the development of three-dimensional printing, it offers the opportunity to overcome the economic and technical obstacles, and can provide firm procedure ground for the licensing agreement to be concluded under intellectual property law. In the environment of 3D printing, making open source hardware licensing agreement under patent right or contract binding has shortcomings. Therefore, it's enforceable to construct an open hardware license for three-dimensional under copyright law. The license agreement should include authorization provisions, duty provisions and disclaimer of warranty. The copyright law should take this opportunity to make progress in the fields of dealing with reverse engineering, extend the protection of right of reproduction of product design, and construct new kind of neighborhood right. Along with the proposing of reasonable license agreement, it may promote the development of open hardware for three-dimensional printing.
-
[1] Rachel King. Big companies open up to open-source software [N]. Wall Street Journal,2012-09-06(5). [2] Christina Raasch. Product development in open design communities: a process perspective[J]. International Law Journal Innovation & Technology Management,2011(4):557-575. [3] 刘强,欧阳旸. 产品设计图著作权保护研究——以3D打印为视角[J]. 重庆理工大学学报:社会科学版,2014(7):63-70. [4] 郑友德,王活涛. 论规制3D 打印的法政策框架构建[J]. 电子知识产权,2014(5):22-29. [5] Eli Greenbaum. Three-Dimensional printing and open source hardware[J]. New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law,2013(2): 257-294. [6] 刘强,张文思. 我国工业设计权制度的构建——以3D 打印为视角[J]. 武陵学刊,2015(3):62-67. [7] 马驰升. 美国“云计算”“数据流”技术的数字娱乐版权保护及其启示[J]. 中南大学学报:社会科学版,2014(6):148-153. [8] 刘强. 3D打印技术专利侵权问题研究[J]. 武陵学刊,2014(1):55-60. [9] 刘强,王超. 3D打印视野下的专利间接侵权——兼评《专利法修改草案(征求意见稿)》第71 条之规定[J]. 电子知识产权,2015(5):29-34. [10] 蔡晓东. 论美国专利侵权的不公平行为抗辩[J].中南大学学报:社会科学版,2012(3):93-96. [11] John Ackermann. Toward open source hardware[J]. University of Dayton Law Review,2013(1):183-222. [12] 熊琦. 3D打印行为的著作权规制:旧瓶能否装新酒?[J]. 电子知识产权,2014(5):46-50. [13] John Mangan,Chandra Lalwani,Tim Butcher. Global logistics and supply chain management(2d. ed.)[M]. Queensland,Australia: John Wiley,Sons Australia Limited,2011:40. [14] 张今,迟海生. 开放源码运动对计算机软件保护的启示[J]. 网络法律评论,2004(2):71-78. [15] 张韬略. 开源软件的知识产权问题研究—制度诱因、规则架构及理论反思[J]. 网络法律评论,2004(2):3-65. [16] 姚强,王丽平. “万能制造机”背后的思考——知识产权法视野下3D打印技术的风险分析与对策[J]. 科技与法律,2013(2):17-21. [17] 马忠法,陈潜. 3D打印中的“复制”与“合理使用”[J]. 上海财经大学学报,2015(3):97-104. [18] 吕炳斌. 实用艺术作品可版权性的理论逻辑[J]. 比较法研究,2014(3):68-80. [19] 黄亮. 3D打印著作权问题探讨[J]. 现代出版,2015(2):24-27. -
![WeChat](http://www.frunetbio.com/journal/fileBJLGDXXBSKB/journal/article/bjlgdxxbshkxb/2016/1/PIC/wechat_cn_20160118.jpg)
计量
- 文章访问数:548
- HTML全文浏览量:0
- PDF下载量:1292
- 被引次数:0