The Analysis of the Causation of Criminal Law in the fact-value Entangling Relationship-To analyze the fact-and-value entanglement theory of Hilary Putnam
-
摘要:自休谟始，事实与价值截然分离，一定意义上支持了长期处于通说地位的“刑法因果关系是客观事实”的论断。希拉里·普特南以“事实价值”为基础提出缠结理论，终结了事实与价值二分法的论断。刑法因果关系判断同样契合事实要素与价值要素缠结的现实。在内容上，刑法事实因果关系是扩展和延长因果事实要素的界定和分析；刑法价值因果关系是主体价值、客体价值及相互转化、限定。在本质上，刑法事实因果关系是行为支配关系、相关关系；刑法价值因果关系是刑法法律关系，一种是而又不限于结果导向主义的产物。刑法事实因果关系负担着确证案件事实、奠基法律因果关系的功能，而刑法价值因果关系具有拟制、确立两种功能。刑法因果关系是一种以事实价值为基础，基于发现的价值选择，通过发现、解构与重构，解释两条路径构建。Abstract:Since Hume's "A Treatise of Human Nature" was published,the state of the complete separation of fact from value,in a sense,offers the support to the thesis of the causation of criminal law as objective facts,which had been in a position of common remarks for a rather long period. The entanglement theory,put forward by Hilary Putnam with the basis of fact-value theory,puts an end to the thesis of the Fact and Value Dichotomy. The causal judgment rules in criminal law also conform to the reality of the entanglement of facts and values. In content,the fact-value relationship of the facts in criminal law extends the definition and analysis of the elements of the causal facts-the causation of the value of criminal law is mutual transformation and definition between the subjective value and objective value. In essence,the causation of the facts in criminal law is the one of behavior controlling and interrelation. That is,the causation of the facts in criminal law is legal relation in criminal law,which is one of the products but doesn't just originate from result-oriented pragmatism. The causation of the facts in criminal law has the function of confirming the facts in cases and laying the foundation to causality in law and the causality of the value in criminal law performs two functions of drafting and confirmation. The causation of the value in criminal law is choice of value by researching based on the fact-value theory,which is constructed by the two ways-one is of discovering and deconstruction and the other of reconstruction and explanation.
-
Key words:
- causation/
- entanglement theory/
- fact and value
-
[1] 希拉里·普特南. 事实与价值二分法的崩溃[M]. 应奇,译. 北京:东方出版社,2006. [2] 高铭暄,马克昌. 刑法学[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2007. [3] 大卫·休谟. 人性论[M]. 关文运,译. 北京:商务印书馆,1980. [4] 威拉德·蒯因. 从逻辑的观点看[M]. 江天骥,译. 上海:上海译文出版社,1987. [5] 克劳斯·罗克辛. 德国最高法院判例刑法总论[M]. 何庆仁,蔡桂生,译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012. [6] 哈特,托尼·奥诺尔. 法律中的因果关系[M]. 张绍谦,孙战国,译. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005. [7] LEON G. The causal relation issuel in neligence law[J]. Mich.LR,1961(60):543-576. [8] 储槐植. 美国刑法[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2005. [9] 刘士心. 美国刑法中的犯罪论原理[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2010. [10] JOSHUA D. Understanding criminal law[M]. LEXIS Publishing,2001. [11] 罗斯科·庞德. 法理学[M]. 邓正来,译. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004. [12] 侯国云. 刑法因果新论[M]. 北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2012. [13] 托克维·迈尔-舍恩伯格,肯尼思·库克耶. 大数据时代——生活工作与思维的大变革[M]. 盛海燕,周涛,译. 杭州:浙江人民出版社,2013. [14] 大卫·休谟. 人类理智研究[M]. 周晓亮,译. 北京:中国法制出版社,2011. [15] 张心向. 论场域资本运作对刑事司法的影响——以布迪厄资本理论为分析视角[J]. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(2):123-133. [16] 约翰·罗尔斯. 正义论[M]. 何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白,译. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988. [17] JOSHUA D. Case and materials on criminal law[M]. Thomson West,2008. [18] 曾世雄. 损害赔偿法原理[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001. [19] 陈聪富. 因果关系与损害赔偿[M]. 台北:元照出版公司,2004. [20] 陈金钊. 法律人思维中的规范隐退[J]. 中国法学,2012(1):5-18. [21] MATTEW B. MILES A. 质性资料的分析:方法与实践[M]. 张芬芬,译. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2008. [22] 伊利亚·普里戈金. 确定性的终结——时间、混沌与新自然法则[M]. 湛敏,译. 上海:上海科技教育出版社,2009. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数:404
- HTML全文浏览量:1
- PDF下载量:379
- 被引次数:0
下载:
