高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

碳配额约束对企业竞争力的影响

王琛

downloadPDF
文章导航> bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）> 2017> (1): 47-55
王琛. 碳配额约束对企业竞争力的影响[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (1): 47-55. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0107
引用本文: 王琛. 碳配额约束对企业竞争力的影响[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (1): 47-55.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0107
shu
WANG Chen. The Impact of Carbon Quota Constraints on the Competitiveness of Companies[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (1): 47-55. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0107
Citation: WANG Chen. The Impact of Carbon Quota Constraints on the Competitiveness of Companies[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (1): 47-55.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0107
shu

碳配额约束对企业竞争力的影响

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0107
  • 1.

    bob手机在线登陆 管理与经济学院 能源与环境政策研究中心, 北京 100081

The Impact of Carbon Quota Constraints on the Competitiveness of Companies

  • 1.

    Center for Energy & Environmental Policy Research, School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

  • 摘要:碳交易体系导致企业生产的成本构成和盈利模式发生变化，基于博弈论方法采用古诺模型，对同行业中的双寡头企业在碳配额约束下产量、市场占有率等方面的竞争力变化进行分析，同时探讨碳交易约束对整个行业生产力的影响，在研究中突出分析了企业碳强度的差异对碳约束下企业竞争力的影响，并试图探索理论模型所揭示的现实意义。模型结果与算例仿真结果显示：碳配额约束会对不同碳强度的两企业造成产量方面的影响，碳强度低的企业具有较大的碳竞争力，这种竞争力会帮助其在同行业竞争中占有优势，使其在产品市场上的占有率提高，当配额总量越紧张时，这种竞争力优势愈发凸显；而碳强度较高的企业，对碳配额约束所带来的压力越敏感，在碳配额总量紧张时，过高的碳强度可能导致企业难以承受碳成本，大幅度减少产量，甚至被挤出产品市场。从整个行业的产量来看，碳配额约束的实施将在一定程度上对行业的整体产量有所影响，随着碳配额总量缩紧，行业的总产出减小，会给政策的制定提出更高的要求，如何在经济发展和减少排放之间寻求平衡，是相关政策制定者和学者们需要深刻思考的问题之一。
    Abstract:For companies,Carbon Emission Trading Scheme will lead to the changes of their production cost structure and profit mode. Based on game theory,this paper used Cournot model to analyze the competitiveness change of companies with carbon quota constraints,including the output change,the market share change. The effect of carbon quota constraints on the output of the whole industry sector was discussed as well. The carbon intensity difference between companies was highlighted in order to explore the importance of enhancing energy efficiency and reducing carbon intensity. The results show that the company with lower carbon intensity has larger carbon competitiveness that will help the company have advantage of market share at production market. Particularly,with the carbon quota cap becoming tighter,such advantage will get more prominent. The company with higher carbon intensity is more sensitive to the pressure of carbon quota constraint. When the cap is not very loose,the too high carbon intensity may lead to unbearable carbon burden. The most terrible result will be that the company is force to exit the market. From the industrial level,the implementation of emission trading system will make the output reduce to some degree,which raise an important for policy makers,that is,how to find a balance between economy development and carbon reduction.
  • [1] KLAASSEN G,NENTJES A,SMITH M. Testing the theory of emissions trading:experimental evidence on alternative mechanisms for global carbon trading[J]. Ecological Economics,2005,53(1):47-58.
    [2] PERDAN S,AZAPAGIC A. Carbon trading:current schemes and future developments[J]. Energy Policy,2011,39:6040-6054.
    [3] UDDIN N,HOLTEDAHLP. Emission trading schemes-avenues for unified accounting practices[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2013,52(4):46-52.
    [4] AZAPAGIC A,PERDAN S. Corporate sustainability management:a methodology and a case study in the mining and minerals sector[J]. International Journal of Mining & Mineral Engineering,2010,2(4):310-337.
    [5] WEITZMAN M L. Prices vs. quantities[J]. Review of Economic Studies,1974,41(4):477-491.
    [6] GOLDBLATT M. Comparison of emissions trading and carbon taxation in South Africa[J]. Climate Policy,2010,10(5):511-526.
    [7] BARANZINI A,GOLDEMBERG J,SPECK S. A future for carbon taxes[J]. Ecological Economics,2000,32:395-412.
    [8] LIPPKE B,PEREZ-GARCIA J. Will either cap and trade or a carbon emissions tax be effective in monetizing carbon as an ecosystem service[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2008,256:2160-2165.
    [9] ERMOLIEVA T,ERMOLIEV Y,FISCHER G,et al. Carbon emission trading and carbon taxes under uncertainties[J]. Climate Change,2010,103:277-289.
    [10] BRISTOW A L,WARDMAN M,ZANNI A M,et al. Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax[J]. Ecological Economics,2010,69:1824-1837.
    [11] BABIKER M H,METCALF G E,REILLY J. Tax distortion and global climate policy[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.2003,46:269-287.
    [12] ZHANG Z X,BARANZINI A. What do we know about carbon taxes? an inquiry into their impacts on competitiveness and distribution of income[J]. Ssrn Electronic Journal,2000,32(4):507-518.
    [13] CRALS E,VEREECK L. Taxes,tradable rights and transaction costs[J]. European Journal of Law and Economics,2008,20:199-223.
    [14] PARRY I W H,SMALL K A. Does Britain or the United States have the right gasoline tax?[J]. The American Economic Review,2005,95:409-434.
    [15] PEZZCY J C V. Emission taxes and tradable permits. a comparison of views on long-run efficiency[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2003,26,329-342.
    [16] WEST S E,WILLIANS R C. Estimates form a consumer demand system:implications for the incidence of environmental taxes[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2004,47:535-558.
    [17] SMALE R,HATLEY M,HEPBURN C,et al. The impact of CO2emissions trading on firm profits and market prices[J]. Climate Policy,2006,6(1):31-48.
    [18] DEMAILLY D,QUIRION P. CO2abatement,competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS:grandfathering versus output-based allocation[J]. Climate Policy,2006,6(1):93-113.
    [19] TOMAS R A F,RIBEIRO F R,SANTOS V M S,et al. Assessment of the impact of the European CO2,emissions trading scheme on the Portuguese chemical industry[J]. Energy Policy,2010,38(1):626-632.
    [20] LEE M. Potential cost savings from internal/external CO2,emissions trading in the Korean electric power industry[J]. Energy Policy,2011,39(10):6162-6167.
    [21] KARA M,SYRI S,LEHTILA S,et al. The impacts of EU CO2,emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland[J]. Energy Economics,2008,30(2):193-211.
    [22] 杜少甫,董骏峰,梁樑,等. 考虑排放许可与交易的生产优化[J]. 中国管理科学,2009,17(3):81-86.
    [23] LUND P. Impacts of EU carbon emission trade directive on energy-intensive industries-Indicative micro-economic analyses[J]. Ecological Economics,2007,63(4):799-806.
    [24] CHEN Y,SIJM J,BENJAMIN F H,LISE W. Implications of CO2emissions trading for short-run electricity market outcomes in northwest Europe[J]. Journal of Regulatory Economics,2008,34(3):251-281.
    [25] CHAN H S,LI S J,ZHANG F. Firm competitiveness and the European Union emissions trading scheme[J]. Energy Policy,2013,63(6):1056-1064.
    [26] SARTZETAKIS E S. On the efficiency of competitive markets for emission permits[J]. Environmental & Resource Economics,2004,27(1):1-19.
    [27] JONES R,MENDELSON H. Information goods vs. industrial goods:cost structure and competition[J]. Management Science,2011,57(1):164-176.
  • [1] 王兆华.《碳交易效率与企业减排决策研究》评介. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(1): 187-188.
    [2] 周鹏, 高朱红, 闻雯.政府补贴、碳减排目标约束与工业企业低碳策略选择. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(4): 118-128.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.1420
    [3] 赵玉焕, 史巧玲, 伍思健.参与全球价值链对中国出口贸易碳强度的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(4): 17-27.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.3568
    [4] 鄢哲明, 邓晓兰, 杨志明.异质性技术创新对碳强度的影响——基于全球专利数据. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (1): 20-27.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0103
    [5] 王芹鹏, 赵道致.竞争市场中生产与碳交易策略. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (1): 54-61.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0108
    [6] 王韶华.中国工业行业碳强度的因素分析——基于超越对数生产函数. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (3): 22-29.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0303
    [7] 张伟, 王韶华.碳强度对中国主要产业部门产值变动敏感性的动态估计. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (4): 41-48.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0406
    [8] 邓晓兰, 陈宝东.碳减排约束下我国产业结构变迁的路径选择. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2014, (6): 1-6.
    [9] 梁巧梅, 刘维旭, 梁晓捷, 赵鲁涛.碳排放强度分解决策支持系统的研制与应用. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2014, (5): 37-41.
    [10] 林涛, 李灵.天津市碳排放与能源强度影响因素研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (6): 33-38.
    [11] 王科, 李默洁.碳排放配额分配的DEA建模与应用. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (4): 7-13,20.
    [12] 陈占锋, 刘通凡, 殷方超, 郭彩云.中国区域碳强度目标设定的情景分析——以北京市为例. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (5): 16-22.
    [13] 石蕾, 李洋.中国区域经济增长的碳排放强度差异及其敛散性. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (2): 34-38.
    [14] 吴春林, 汪波, 殷红春.建筑承包商品牌竞争力评价模型——基于网络层次分析法. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (3): 32-38.
    [15] 纪方, 赵道致.基于红皇后理论的低碳经济对企业竞争力影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2011, (5): 7-11.
    [16] 赵国杰, 郭景瑞, 于美霞, 刘明.企业竞争力构成要素辨析与评价指标选择的思考. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2009, (5): 51-54.
    [17] 孟凡臣, 韩志龙, 白明琦.基于核心竞争力的中国企业跨国并购问题分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2007, (2): 40-45.
    [18] 郑辉, 汪波.基于物元模型的港口可持续竞争力二维评价模型. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2007, (4): 59-62.
    [19] 韩伯棠, 于丽娟.企业竞争力的多方位塑造. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2003, (1): 79-80.
    [20] 王晓莹.浅议中小企业核心竞争力的培育. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2002, (3): 75-77.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:629
  • HTML全文浏览量:2
  • PDF下载量:474
  • 被引次数:0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-21
  • 刊出日期:2017-01-10

碳配额约束对企业竞争力的影响

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0107
  • 1. bob手机在线登陆 管理与经济学院 能源与环境政策研究中心, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-21
  • 刊出日期:2017-01-10

摘要:碳交易体系导致企业生产的成本构成和盈利模式发生变化，基于博弈论方法采用古诺模型，对同行业中的双寡头企业在碳配额约束下产量、市场占有率等方面的竞争力变化进行分析，同时探讨碳交易约束对整个行业生产力的影响，在研究中突出分析了企业碳强度的差异对碳约束下企业竞争力的影响，并试图探索理论模型所揭示的现实意义。模型结果与算例仿真结果显示：碳配额约束会对不同碳强度的两企业造成产量方面的影响，碳强度低的企业具有较大的碳竞争力，这种竞争力会帮助其在同行业竞争中占有优势，使其在产品市场上的占有率提高，当配额总量越紧张时，这种竞争力优势愈发凸显；而碳强度较高的企业，对碳配额约束所带来的压力越敏感，在碳配额总量紧张时，过高的碳强度可能导致企业难以承受碳成本，大幅度减少产量，甚至被挤出产品市场。从整个行业的产量来看，碳配额约束的实施将在一定程度上对行业的整体产量有所影响，随着碳配额总量缩紧，行业的总产出减小，会给政策的制定提出更高的要求，如何在经济发展和减少排放之间寻求平衡，是相关政策制定者和学者们需要深刻思考的问题之一。

English Abstract

王琛. 碳配额约束对企业竞争力的影响[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (1): 47-55. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0107
引用本文: 王琛. 碳配额约束对企业竞争力的影响[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (1): 47-55.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0107
shu
WANG Chen. The Impact of Carbon Quota Constraints on the Competitiveness of Companies[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (1): 47-55. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0107
Citation: WANG Chen. The Impact of Carbon Quota Constraints on the Competitiveness of Companies[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (1): 47-55.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0107
shu
参考文献 (27)

目录

    /

      返回文章
      返回

        作者相关

        写作规范

        友情链接

        总访问量: 今日访问量:

        版权所有：bob手机在线登陆学术期刊中心

        主管单位: 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部 主办单位: bob手机在线登陆 地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街5号

        本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司开发  百度统计

        Baidu
        map