高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

大众参与网络众包竞赛的个体绩效影响因素

夏恩君,赵轩维,宋剑锋,李森

downloadPDF
文章导航> bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）> 2017> (2): 79-86
夏恩君, 赵轩维, 宋剑锋, 李森. 大众参与网络众包竞赛的个体绩效影响因素[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (2): 79-86. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0211
引用本文: 夏恩君, 赵轩维, 宋剑锋, 李森. 大众参与网络众包竞赛的个体绩效影响因素[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (2): 79-86.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0211
shu
XIA Enjun, ZHAO Xuanwei, SONG Jianfeng, LI Sen. The Factors Affecting Individual Performance of Network Crowdsourcing Contests[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (2): 79-86. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0211
Citation: XIA Enjun, ZHAO Xuanwei, SONG Jianfeng, LI Sen. The Factors Affecting Individual Performance of Network Crowdsourcing Contests[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (2): 79-86.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0211
shu

大众参与网络众包竞赛的个体绩效影响因素

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0211
  • 1.

    bob手机在线登陆 管理与经济学院, 北京 100081

基金项目:

国家自然基金面上项目资助“企业开放式创新社区网络演化研究”（71172170）;国家自然基金面上项目资助“开放式创新网络众包模式的运行机理及行为管理研究”（71572012）

The Factors Affecting Individual Performance of Network Crowdsourcing Contests

  • 1.

    School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

  • 摘要:根据网络众包竞赛运行的特点和众包绩效的相关研究，运用多元线性回归的方法，从网络众包竞赛参与者个体的参赛数量、任期和参赛间隔等行为方面着手，通过对大众参与网络众包竞赛的绩效影响因素开展分析，识别网络众包竞赛个体绩效的主要影响变量。结果表明：参赛者个体的任期和提交次数对比赛成绩有显著的正向作用；总排名和参赛间隔对比赛成绩有显著的负向作用；参赛数量在任期和比赛成绩之间起到了负向的调节作用；参赛数量在参赛间隔和比赛成绩之间起到了正向的调节作用；参赛间隔在任期和比赛成绩之间也起到了负向的调节作用。
    Abstract:According to the running characteristics of network crowdsourcing contests and related research of crowdsourcing performance, this paper applied the multiple linear regression method, and studied the factors that affect the performance of public participation from competitors' participation numbers, tenures, participation interval and other behavior factors. Through linear regression method, it identified the key variables in affecting individual performance of network crowdsourcing contests. The results show that competitor' tenures and submitted entries have significant effect on their performance positively; competitors' rankings and participation interval have significant effect on their performance negatively. Moreover, competitors' participation numbers moderate the relationship between tenures and performance negatively, and the relationship between participation interval and performance positively. In addition, competitors' participation interval moderate the relationship between tenures and performance negatively too.
  • [1] HOWE J. The rise of crowdsourcing[J]. Wired Magazine,2006,14(6):176-183.
    [2] HOWE J. Crowdsourcing:why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business[M]. CA:Three Rivers Press,2010.
    [3] JEPPESEN L B,LAKHANI K R. Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search[J]. Organization Science,2010,21(5):1016-1033.
    [4] VERONA G,PRANDELLI E,SAWHNEY M. Innovation and virtual environments:towards virtual knowledge brokers[J]. Organization Studies,2006,27(6):765-788.
    [5] DAVID A G. Is crowdfunding a form of crowdsourcing?[EB/OL].(2015-10-08)[2016-01-16]. HTTP://DAILYCROWDSOURCE.com/taxonomy.
    [6] WALTER T,BACK A. Towards measuring crowdsourcing sucess:an empircal study on effects of external factors[C]. The 6th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems,Limassol,2009.
    [7] PLUCKER J A,BEGHETTO R A,DOW G T. Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? potentials,pitfalls,and future directions in creativity research[J]. Educational Psychologist,2004,39(2):83-96.
    [8] DEAN D L,HENDER J M,RODGERS T L,et al. Identifying quality,novel,and creative ideas:constructs and scales for idea evaluation[J].Journal of the Association for Information Systems,2006,7(1):646-699.
    [9] YANG J,ADAMIC L,ACKERMAN M. Crowdsourcing and knowledge sharing:strategic user behavior on taskcn[C]. Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce,NewYork:ACM Publisher,2008:246-255.
    [10] YANG Y,CHEN P,PAVLOU P. Open innovation:an empirical study of online contests[C]. International Conference on Information Systems(ICIS),Phoenix,AZ,2009:1-16.
    [11] LIU T X,YANG J,LADA A. Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions:a field experiment on taskcn[J]. American Society for Information Science & Technology,2014,48(1):1-4.
    [12] NOV O,NAAMAN M,YE C. Motivational,structural and tenure factors that impact online community photo sharing[C]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media,San Jose,California,USA,2009:138-145.
    [13] ROGSTADIUS J. An assessment of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on task performance in crowdsourcing markets[C]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media,Barcelona,Catalonia,Spain,2011:321-328.
    [14] SAUERMAMN H,COHEN W M. What makes them tick? employee motives and industrial innovation[J]. Management Science,2010,56(12):2134-2153.
    [15] ROSENKOPF L,NERKAR A. Beyond local search:boundary-spanning,exploration,and impact in the optical disk industry[J].Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(4):287-306.
    [16] KOZINETS R V,HEMETSBERGER A,SCHAU H J. The wisdom of consumer crowds[J]. Journal of Macromarketing,2008,28(4):339-354.
    [17] ARCHAK N. Money,glory and cheap talk:analyzing strategic behavior of contestants in simultaneous crowdsourcing contests on TopCoder.com[C]. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web,New York,NY,USA:ACM,2010:21-30.
    [18] SCHUHMACHER M C,KUESTER S. Identification of lead user characteristics driving the quality of service innovation ideas[J].Creativity and Innovation Management,2012,21(4):427-442.
    [19] KHASRAGHI A J. Crowdsourcing contests:understanding the effect of competitors' participation history on their performance[J]. Behaviour & Information Technology,2014,33(12):1383-1395.
    [20] BOUDEAU K J,LACETERA N,LAKHANI K R.Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests:an empirical analysis[J]. Management Science,2011,57(5):843-863.
    [21] LUTTGENS D,POLLOK P,ANTONS D. Wisdom of the crowd and capabilities of a few:internal success factors of crowdsourcing for innovation[J]. Journal of Business Economics,2014,84(3):339.
    [22] KHAJVAND M. Estimating customer lifetime value based on RFM analysis of customer purchase behavior:case study[J]. Procedia Computer Science,2011(3):57-63.
    [23] NG T W H,FELDMAN D C. Organizational tenure and job performance[J]. Journal of Management,2010,36(5):1220-1250.
    [24] HOGARTH R,EINHORN H. Order effects in belief updating:the belief-adjustment model[J]. Cognitive Psychology,1992,24(1):1-55.
    [25] BOUDREAU K J. Field evidence on individual behavior & performance in rank-order tournaments[D]. New York,NY,USA:Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Management,2012(13):016.
    [26] LAKHANI K,WOLF R. Why hackers do what they do:understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects[M]. Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,2003.
    [27] ARIELY D,BRACHA A,Meier S. Doing good or doing well? image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially[J]. The American Economic Review,2009,99(1):544-555.
    [28] GIROTRA K,TERWIESCH C,Ulrich K T. Idea generation and the quality of the best idea[J]. Management Science,2010,56(4):591-605.
    [29] SNIRE M,HITT L M. Costly bidding in online markets for IT services[J]. Management Science,2003,49(11):1504-1520.
    [30] 冯小亮,黄敏学. 众包模式中问题解决者参与动机机制研究[J]. 商业经济与管理,2013(4):25-35.
  • [1] 武照亮, 靳敏.居民参与社区环境治理的行为研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2023, 25(1): 55-66.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.0791
    [2] 崔立新, 陈雪丽, 李依玲, 栾子涵.虚拟社区顾客参与服务创新影响机制. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(2): 174-188.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.6225
    [3] 冯国莉, 郝生跃, 李晓光.PPP项目中公共部门关系取向对项目绩效的影响研究——基于项目治理的中介作用. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, (): -.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.0029
    [4] 李春瑜.国有控股企业限薪影响及股权激励调节作用. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(2): 101-111.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.2035
    [5] 刘崇光, 刘浪.价格随机条件下的闭环供应链应急数量弹性契约. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(2): 50-59.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.7955
    [6] 杨贤传, 张磊.媒体说服形塑与城市居民绿色购买行为——调节中介效应检验. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(3): 14-25.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1847
    [7] 王晓红, 胡士磊, 张奔.环境污染对居民的政府信任和政治参与行为的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(2): 31-40.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.2509
    [8] 孔昭君, 夏诗颖, 符之焕.股权众筹质量信号对投资人参与度的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (4): 95-103.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.2315
    [9] 史文强, 刘浪, 汪明月, 李文川.价格随机和销售成本信息不对称下的应急数量弹性契约. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (4): 120-127.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.3423
    [10] 王晓楠.公众环境治理参与行为的多层分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (5): 37-45.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.5182
    [11] 黄洁萍, 曹安琪.知识型众包社会大众参与行为动机及激励机制. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (4): 88-96.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.3253
    [12] 蔡金阳, 韩勇, 胡瑞法, 梁景辉, 郑子豪.企业会展参与及展位面积选择的影响因素. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (2): 103-108.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0214
    [13] 金永生, 李吉音, 李朝辉.网络导向、价值共创与新创企业绩效——制度环境与企业发展阶段的调节. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (6): 70-78.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.2477
    [14] 刘平青, 史俊熙.自我管理绩效出自哪儿?——一个中介调节模型的验证. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (6): 79-86.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0894
    [15] 陈飞宇, 陈红, 龙如银.非期望环境行为的类型及其行为呈现——调节聚焦影响视角. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (5): 28-36.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1372
    [16] 高林, 贺京同, 那艺.创新数量、质量及其激励的异质影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2014, (4): 92-98.
    [17] 党跃臣, 徐娟.基于matlab的网民数量预测模型研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2010, (2): 47-49.
    [18] 翟杰全.科技公共传播：知识普及、科学理解、公众参与. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2008, (6): 29-32.
    [19] 翟杰全.科技公共传播的传播主体及其参与动机. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2005, (5): 13-16.
    [20] 史彦, 李印香.略论成人高等教育的数量观与质量观. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2005, (6): 74-76.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:755
  • HTML全文浏览量:1
  • PDF下载量:571
  • 被引次数:0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-12
  • 刊出日期:2017-03-23

大众参与网络众包竞赛的个体绩效影响因素

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0211
  • 1. bob手机在线登陆 管理与经济学院, 北京 100081
    • 基金项目:

    国家自然基金面上项目资助“企业开放式创新社区网络演化研究”（71172170）;国家自然基金面上项目资助“开放式创新网络众包模式的运行机理及行为管理研究”（71572012）

  • 收稿日期:2016-04-12
  • 刊出日期:2017-03-23

摘要:根据网络众包竞赛运行的特点和众包绩效的相关研究，运用多元线性回归的方法，从网络众包竞赛参与者个体的参赛数量、任期和参赛间隔等行为方面着手，通过对大众参与网络众包竞赛的绩效影响因素开展分析，识别网络众包竞赛个体绩效的主要影响变量。结果表明：参赛者个体的任期和提交次数对比赛成绩有显著的正向作用；总排名和参赛间隔对比赛成绩有显著的负向作用；参赛数量在任期和比赛成绩之间起到了负向的调节作用；参赛数量在参赛间隔和比赛成绩之间起到了正向的调节作用；参赛间隔在任期和比赛成绩之间也起到了负向的调节作用。

English Abstract

夏恩君, 赵轩维, 宋剑锋, 李森. 大众参与网络众包竞赛的个体绩效影响因素[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (2): 79-86. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0211
引用本文: 夏恩君, 赵轩维, 宋剑锋, 李森. 大众参与网络众包竞赛的个体绩效影响因素[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (2): 79-86.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0211
shu
XIA Enjun, ZHAO Xuanwei, SONG Jianfeng, LI Sen. The Factors Affecting Individual Performance of Network Crowdsourcing Contests[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (2): 79-86. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0211
Citation: XIA Enjun, ZHAO Xuanwei, SONG Jianfeng, LI Sen. The Factors Affecting Individual Performance of Network Crowdsourcing Contests[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (2): 79-86.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0211
shu
参考文献 (30)

目录

    /

      返回文章
      返回

        作者相关

        写作规范

        友情链接

        总访问量: 今日访问量:

        版权所有：bob手机在线登陆学术期刊中心

        主管单位: 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部 主办单位: bob手机在线登陆 地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街5号

        本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司开发  百度统计

        Baidu
        map