资源禀赋与企业能力会影响企业质量认证吗?——来自225家农业龙头企业的证据

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0213

1.
中国农业大学经济管理学院, 北京 100083
2.
湖南农业大学商学院, 长沙 410128

基金项目:

北京市自然科学基金面上项目资助（9152012）

Does the Enterprise's Behavior of Quality Certification Influenced by Resource Endowment and Organizational Capability?-Evidence from 225 Leading Agricultural Enterprises

1.
School of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2.
School of Business, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China

摘要:基于对225家农业龙头企业的调查数据，利用Heckman（赫克曼）两步法，从资源能力观的视角研究资源禀赋和企业能力对农业企业是否实施质量认证以及多重认证频度决策的影响。研究表明：（1）规模、技术、品牌、股权集中度、盈利能力和偿债能力等内在特征是影响企业是否实施质量认证的显著因素；（2）规模越大、技术水平和决策者素质越高、盈利能力、偿债能力和营运能力越强的企业越倾向于实施多重质量认证；（3）经营模式和经营战略对企业多重质量认证行为有显著影响，且不同经营模式的边际影响存在显著差异。总之，资源禀赋和企业能力的异质性较好地解释了在面临同样的外部环境时，不同企业之间质量认证行为的差异。
- 资源禀赋/
- 企业能力/
- 质量安全认证/
- 龙头企业/
- 赫克曼两步法
Abstract:Based on the survey of 225 leading agricultural enterprises, this paper uses the Heckman two-step method to find whether the enterprise's behavior of quality certification and the frequency selection is influenced by resource endowment and ability. Under the control of external factors, this study shows that the inherent characteristics of scale, technology, brand reputation, equity, profitability and solvency are also the significant factors affecting enterprise whether to implement quality certification. Moreover, the scale is larger, the level of technology and the quality of entrepreneurs are higher, and the ability of profitability, solvency and operation are stronger, the more the enterprise tends to implement multiple quality certifications. Lastly, business model and business strategy are also the main impact factors, and there are significant differences in the effects of different business models. In a word, the heterogeneity of resource endowment and enterprise ability can explain the difference between different enterprise's behavior of quality certification in the same external environment.
- resource endowment/
- organizational capability/
- quality certification/
- leading enterprises/
- Heckman two-step method

[1]	尹世久,陈默,徐迎军,等. 消费者对安全认证食品信任评价及其影响因素——基于有序Logistic模型的实证分析[J]. 公共管理学报,2013,10(3):111-118.
[2]	CASWELL J A,BREDAHL M E,HOOKER N H.How quality management meta systems are affecting the food industry[J]. Review of Agricultural Economics,1998,20(2):547-557.
[3]	周洁红,幸家刚,虞轶俊. 农产品生产主体质量安全多重认证行为研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社科版),2015,45(2):55-66.
[4]	GOLAN E,KUCHLER F,MITCHELL L.Economics of food labeling[J]. Journal of Consumer Policy,2001,24(2):117-184.
[5]	GRACIA A,MAGIST T. The demand for organic foods in the south of Italy:a discrete choice model[J]. Food Policy,2008,33(5):1-12.
[6]	吴林海,秦沙沙,朱淀,等. 可追溯猪肉原产地属性与可追溯信息属性的消费者偏好分析[J]. 中国农村经济,2015(6):47-62.
[7]	ORTEGA D L,WANG H H,OLYNK WIDMAR N J,et al. Chinese producer behavior:aquaculture famers in southern China[J]. China Economic Review,2014,28(1):540-547.
[8]	MOSCHITZ H,STOLZE M. The influence of policy networks on policy output:a comparison of organic farming policy in the czech republic and poland[J]. Food Policy,2010,35(3):247-255.
[9]	HOBBS J E,BAILEY D,DICKINSON D L,et al. Traceability in the Canadian red meat sector:do consumers care?[J]. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics,2005,53(1):47-65.
[10]	NAPOLITANO F,BRAGHIERI A,PIASENTIER E,et al.Effect of Information about organic production on beef liking and consumer willingness to pay[J]. Food Quality and Preference,2011,21(2):207-212.
[11]	HERATH D,HENSON S. Barriers to haccp implementation:evidence from the food processing sector in Ontario,Canada[J].Agribusiness,2010,26(2):265-279.
[12]	CASEWELL J A. Valuing the benefits and costs of improved food safety and nutrition[J]. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,1998(4):409-424.
[13]	UDITH J M,HENSON S. Identifying economic incentives for Canadian red meat and poultry processing enterprises to adopt enhanced food safety controls[J]. Food Control,2007,18:1363-1371.
[14]	OLLINGER M,DANNA L. The economic forces driving food safety quality in meat and poultry[J]. Review of Agricultural Economics,2008,30(2):289-310.
[15]	方伟,梁俊芬,林伟君. 食品企业质量控制动机及"优质优价"实现状态分析——基于300家国家级农业龙头企业调研[J].农业技术经济,2013(2):112-119.
[16]	SEGERSON K. Mandatory versus voluntary approaches to food safety[J]. Agribusiness,1999,15(1):53-70.
[17]	张蓓,黄志平,杨炳成. 农产品供应链核心企业质量安全控制意愿实证分析——基于广东省214家农产品生产企业的调查数据[J]. 中国农村经济,2014(1):62-74.
[18]	HERETH D,HASSAN Z,HENSON S. Adoption of food safety and quality controls:do firm characteristics matter? evidence from the Canadian food processing sector[J]. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics,2007(55):299-314.
[19]	PETERAF M A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage:a resource-based view[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14:179-191.
[20]	BARNEY J B. Looking inside for competitive advantage[J]. Academy of Management Executive,1995,9(4):49-61.
[21]	BRADY T,DAVIES A. Building project capabilities:from exploratory to exploitative learning[J]. Organization Studies,2004,25(3):1601-621.
[22]	ATHERYE S S. The Indian software industry and its evolving service capability[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2005,14(9):393-418.
[23]	杨俊,张玉利. 基于企业家资源禀赋的创业行为过程分析[J]. 外国经济与管理,2004,(26)2:2-6.
[24]	李新春,苏琦,董文卓. 公司治理与企业家精神[J]. 经济研究,2006(2):57-68.
[25]	王爱群,郭庆海. 中国各地区农业产业化龙头企业竞争力比较分析[J]. 中国农村经济,2008(4):33-43.
[26]	万伦来,马娇娇,朱湖根. 中国农业产业化经营组织模式与龙头企业技术效率——来自安徽农业综合开发产业化经营龙头企业的经验证据[J]. 中国农村经济,2010(10):28-35.
[27]	于鹏. 股权结构与财务重述:来自上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究,2007(9):134-144.
[28]	李志文,宋衍蘅. 股权结构会影响筹资决策吗?——来自中国赛格系公司的案例[J]. 管理世界,2003(6):128-138.
[29]	刘克春,张明林,包丽. 多元化非农经营战略对农业龙头企业产出绩效影响的实证分析——基于江西省农业龙头企业的经验数据[J]. 中国农村经济,2011(12):25-34.
[30]	徐习兵,王永海. 不完全契约、企业能力与内部控制[J]. 审计研究,2013(6):102-107.
[31]	阎达五,陆正飞. 论财务战略的相对独立性——兼论财务战略及财务战略管理的基本特征[J]. 会计研究,2000(9):2-6.
[32]	UDITH J M. Economic Incentives for firms to implement enhanced food safety controls:case of the canadian red meat and poultry processing sector[J]. Review of Agricultural Economics,2006,28(4):494-514.
[33]	NAKAMURA M,TAKAHASHI T,VERTINSKY I. Why Japanese firms choose to certify:a study of managerial responses to environmental issues[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2001,1(42):23-52.
[34]	JIN S,ZHOU J,YE J. Adoption of HACCP system in the Chinese food industry:a comparative analysis[J]. Food Control,2008,19(8):823-828.

[1]	王刚, 陈伟, 曹秋红.国防科技工业科技安全能力评价. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(5): 107-112.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.2628
[2]	王刚, 陈伟, 曹秋红.国防科技工业科技安全能力评价. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, (): -.
[3]	张真源, 黄锡生.资源环境承载能力监测预警的制度功能与完善. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (1): 162-170.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.2844
[4]	王雨飞, 沈立, 王光辉.要素禀赋、资源约束与中国工业企业空间分布——以高速铁路开通为视角. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (5): 65-75.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1024
[5]	庞雨蒙.竞争政策、企业全要素生产率与资源配置效应——基于异质性发电企业的检验. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (1): 17-24.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.3917
[6]	武玉青, 李存金.基于循环CDM模型的中小企业创新能力——企业所有权性质视角. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (3): 105-112.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.2109
[7]	张先锋, 申屠瑶, 王俊凯.环境规制、企业异质性与企业退出. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (4): 43-49.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.2384
[8]	张炎治, 魏晓平, 冯颖.中国矿产资源利益分配研究综述及展望——基于政府与企业视角. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (5): 46-49.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0506
[9]	郝志如, 王申, 吴声声, 宋守信.基于SEM的电力企业人本安全管理效能研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (2): 77-81.
[10]	王秀村, 郑巧云, 周晋.企业动态营销能力构成维度及其路径关系——基于扎根理论的探索性研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (4): 42-47.
[11]	曹文才, 单汨源.科技型中小企业持续创新能力影响因素. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (6): 70-76.
[12]	李志祥, 宋清.科技型创业企业孵化资源配置模式研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2011, (3): 1-4.
[13]	徐东升.在生态学视角下构建企业能力发展模型. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2009, (6): 62-67.
[14]	顾永敏, 聂银学, 王东升.县域发展中两类企业融资难的原因及对策. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2008, (4): 31-35.
[15]	夏恩君, 霍海涛, 孙兰.浅析绩效考核在企业人力资源管理中的应用. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2006, (5): 65-68.
[16]	王东海.论中国的石油资源安全战略. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2003, (5): 59-61.
[17]	崔朝东.中日两国近代企业成长的比较研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2003, (4): 85-87.
[18]	连浩, 韩伯棠.企业资源协同战略与实施案例研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2003, (5): 80-82.
[19]	王奋, 李建宁.国有企业人力资源管理的主要症结和出路. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2001, (1): 60-63.
[20]	虞庞勇, 罗剑波.伙伴关系、知识管理与企业核心能力. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 1999, (1): 49-51.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:566
HTML全文浏览量:2
PDF下载量:653
被引次数:0

留言板

资源禀赋与企业能力会影响企业质量认证吗?——来自225家农业龙头企业的证据

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0213

Does the Enterprise's Behavior of Quality Certification Influenced by Resource Endowment and Organizational Capability?-Evidence from 225 Leading Agricultural Enterprises

计量

资源禀赋与企业能力会影响企业质量认证吗?——来自225家农业龙头企业的证据

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0213

1. 中国农业大学经济管理学院, 北京 100083
2. 湖南农业大学商学院, 长沙 410128

English Abstract

Does the Enterprise's Behavior of Quality Certification Influenced by Resource Endowment and Organizational Capability?-Evidence from 225 Leading Agricultural Enterprises

1. School of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2. School of Business, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

留言板

资源禀赋与企业能力会影响企业质量认证吗?——来自225家农业龙头企业的证据

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0213

Does the Enterprise's Behavior of Quality Certification Influenced by Resource Endowment and Organizational Capability?-Evidence from 225 Leading Agricultural Enterprises

计量

出版历程

资源禀赋与企业能力会影响企业质量认证吗?——来自225家农业龙头企业的证据

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0213

1. 中国农业大学 经济管理学院, 北京 1000832. 湖南农业大学 商学院, 长沙 410128

English Abstract

Does the Enterprise's Behavior of Quality Certification Influenced by Resource Endowment and Organizational Capability?-Evidence from 225 Leading Agricultural Enterprises

1. School of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China2. School of Business, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

1. 中国农业大学经济管理学院, 北京 100083
2. 湖南农业大学商学院, 长沙 410128

1. School of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2. School of Business, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China