地震灾时个体行为反应模式与影响因素——以芦山地震为例

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1118

1.
西南交通大学公共管理与政法学院, 成都 610031
2.
西南交通大学经济管理学院, 成都 610031
3.
香港中文大学工商管理学院, 香港 999077

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金青年项目资助（71402150）;教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目资助（17YJC630056）;四川省社会科学重点研究基地西部交通战略与区域发展研究中心资助项目（XJQ007）;四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地社会发展与社会风险控制研究中心2017年度项目资助（SR17A02）

Individual's Immediately Behavioral Responses Modes and Influencing Factors in Earthquake-The Case of Lushan Earthquake

1.
School of Public Administration and Law, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
2.
School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
3.
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Business School, Hongkong 999077, China

摘要:研究地震发生时个体的行为反应特征和分类模式，并阐释其影响因素。研究结果发现：灾时第一时间的行为反应有逃跑、躲避、寻求信息、木鸡、利他行为、保护财产和未反应等类型，地震后半小时的行为反应依次为联系家人行为、信息交流行为、采取措施、疏散、寻求归属和未反应。灾时第一时间的行为反应根据可控制程度和激发程度分为四大模式，影响行为反应模式选择的因素包括感知震动强度、感知风险、从众心理、地震经历、反应能力等。建议政府管理者针对不同的行为反应模式，锁定需要重点关注的人群，通过加强灾前教育和演练、完善灾时救援和风险沟通方案，引导公众采取更科学有效的行为反应来降低地震造成的伤害。
- 地震灾害/
- 灾时行为反应/
- 应急响应/
- 风险感知
Abstract:The characteristics and classification of individuals' behavioral responses during earthquakes and the important influencing factors were examined in this paper. The research findings reveal that immediate behavioral responses during earthquakes include escaping, seeking shelter, seeking information, freezing, altruistic behavior, protecting property and having no reaction. Individuals' behaviors within half an hour after an earthquake in order are contacting family members, information communication, undertaking actions, evacuation, seeking affiliation and no reaction. Immediate behavioral responses can be divided into four modes based on two dimensions involving the extent of controllability and arousal. The behavioral response modes are influenced by individuals' shock perception, risk perception, conformity, earthquake experience and reaction capacity. In order to effectively cope with earthquake and reduce the damage caused from earthquake, we suggest that government manager should focused on specific group of people that mostly need help based on different behavioral response modes, enhance earthquake education and drills, and improve disaster relief and risk communication system.
- earthquake disasters/
- immediately behavioral response/
- emergency response/
- risk perception

[1]	李华强,范春梅,贾建民,等. 突发性灾害中的公众风险感知与应急管理——以5.12汶川地震为例[J]. 管理世界,2009(6):52-60.
[2]	LAMLIE E,THOMAS M W,DAVID M J,et al. Human behaviour during and immediately following earthquake shaking:developing a methodological approach for analysing video footage[J]. Natural Hazards,2015,6(10):32-36.
[3]	PIETRANTONI L,PRATI G. Resilience among first responders[J]. African Health Sciences,2009,8(3):14-20.
[4]	郭强. 对灾害的反应——社会学的考察(之一)[J]. 社会,2001(11):24-27.
[5]	朱华桂. 突发灾害情境下灾民恐慌行为及影响因素分析[J]. 学海,2012(5):90-96.
[6]	LEONARD G S,MATSUO I,MURAKAMI H. Tsunami evacuation:lessons from the great east Japan earthquake and tsunami of March 11th 2011[R]. GNS Science Report,2012.
[7]	LINDELL M K,CARLA S P,CHRISTOPHER E G,et al. Households'immediate responses to the 2009 American Samoa earthquake and tsunami[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,2015(12):328-340.
[8]	AGUIRRE B E. Commentary on "understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster". emergency evacuations panic and social psychology[J]. Psychiatry,2005,68(2):121-129.
[9]	DRURY J,COCKING C,REICHER S. Everyone for themselves? a comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors[J]. British Journal Social Psychology,2009,48(3):487-506.
[10]	KULLIGOWSKI E D,MILETI D S. Modeling pre-evacuation delay by occupants in world trade center towers 1 and 2 on september 11,2001[J]. Fire Safety Journal,2009,44(4):487~496.
[11]	SHEMAN M F,PEYROT M,MAGDA L A,et al. Modeling pre-evacuation delay by evacuees in world trade center towers 1 and 2 on September 11,2001:a revisit using regression analysis[J]. Fire Safety Journal,2011,46(7):414-424.
[12]	LINDELLl M K,PERRY R W. The protective action decision model:theoretical modifications and additional evidence[J]. Risk Analysis,2012,32(4):616-632.
[13]	MAWSON A R. Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster[J]. Psychiatry,2005,68(2):95-113.
[14]	PRATI G,CATUFI V,PIETRANTONI L.Emotional and behavioural reactions to tremors of the umbria-marche earthquake[J]. Disasters. 2012,36(3):439-451.
[15]	HEATH S E,KASS P H,BECK A M,et al. Human and pet-related risk factors for household evacuation failure during a natural disaster[J]. American Journal of Epidemiology,2001,153(7):659-665.
[16]	WESTER M. Fight,flight or freeze:assumed reactions of the public during a crisis[J]. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management,2011,19(4):207-214.
[17]	LEACH J. Why people ‘freeze’ in an emergency:temporal and cognitive constraints on survival responses[J]. Aviation,Space,and Environmental Medicine,2004,75(6):539-542.
[18]	D'ORAZIO M,SPALAZZI L,QUAGLIARINI E,et al. Agent-based model for earthquake pedestrians'evacuation in urban outdoor scenarios:behavioural patterns definition and evacuation paths choice[J]. Safety Science,2014,62:450~465.
[19]	PRATI G,SACCINTO E,PIETRANOTONI L,et al. The 2012 northern Italy earthquakes:modelling human behavior[J]. Natural Hazards,2013,69(1):99-113.
[20]	李华强,王顺洪,范春梅,等. 突发性灾害中的公众恐惧心理及其应急管理研究[J]. 华东经济管理,2011,25(9):36-40.
[21]	BROWN R,KULIK J. Flashbulb memories[J]. Cognition,1977,5(1):73-99.
[22]	KVAVILASHVILI L,MIRANI J,SCHLAGMAN S,et al. Consistency of flashbulb memories of september 11 over long delays:implications for consolidation and wrong time slice hypotheses[J].Journal of Memory and Language.2009,61(4):556-572.

[1]	成海燕.声誉视角下我国自然灾害应急管理问责的特点、逻辑及优化 ——基于1998-2018年的实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, (): -.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.2825
[2]	成海燕.中国自然灾害应急管理问责特点、逻辑及优化. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(5): 122-132.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.2825
[3]	刘纪达, 安实, 王健, 麦强.一体化应急应战协作网络结构与演进——以自然灾害和事故灾难事件为例. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(6): 96-106.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.7006
[4]	王晓楠, 周林意.新媒体影响力对雾霾风险感知的作用机制. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(2): 41-49.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.3290
[5]	严玲, 刘柳, 曾诚.合同风险分担条款对承包人公平感知的影响——基于多元参照点的实验研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (2): 67-77.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1319
[6]	贺明华, 梁晓蓓, 肖琳.共享经济监管机制对感知隐私风险、消费者信任及持续共享意愿的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (6): 55-64.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.3713
[7]	邬松涛, 何建敏, 李守伟.基于多属性羊群行为的股票风险及其传染. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (1): 64-72.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0109
[8]	王丽丽.信息一致性视角下媒体报道对风险感知的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (6): 153-158.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0621
[9]	沈鹏熠, 王志平.在线零售商营销道德行为的消费者响应机理——理论模型及实证检验. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (6): 81-89.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0611
[10]	王仙雅, 毛文娟.消费者对企业社会责任缺失行为的感知——消费者归因和期望的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (6): 74-80,112.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0610
[11]	刘铁忠, 许振, 郝欣, 王梓薇, 王珍珍.城市运行监管与应急响应平战结合机制研究——来自北京市海淀区地方政府经验数据. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (1): 106-110.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0115
[12]	陈鹏, 洪卫军, 张萌.突发性群体暴力事件的复杂特征与动态模型研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (2): 95-99.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0214
[13]	张纪海, 任帆, 张显龙.中国应急物资产业链的风险来源及防范策略. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2014, (1): 92-96.
[14]	唐攀, 周坚.非常规突发事件应急响应组织结构及运行模式. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (2): 82-89.
[15]	丁韶华, 陈庭强, 何建敏, 尹群耀.DSSW模型的交易者行为风险度量方法. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (3): 39-43,55.
[16]	刘浪.非常规突发事件航空应急物流响应的军地协调机制. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (2): 93-99.
[17]	薛永基, 杨志坚, 李健.慈善捐赠行为对企业品牌资产的影响——企业声誉与风险感知的中介效应. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (4): 58-66.
[18]	刘浪, 黄有方.基于免疫应答原理的应急物流响应机制的构建. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2011, (2): 70-76.
[19]	李娟, 黄晖, 褚云汉.从汶川地震谈灾害应急中的国防科技资源动员——以红外技术为例. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2009, (4): 91-93.
[20]	王小龙, 王小荣.企业会计行为中道德风险问题的探讨. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2000, (4): 48-52.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:598
HTML全文浏览量:1
PDF下载量:609
被引次数:0

留言板

地震灾时个体行为反应模式与影响因素——以芦山地震为例

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1118

Individual's Immediately Behavioral Responses Modes and Influencing Factors in Earthquake-The Case of Lushan Earthquake

计量

地震灾时个体行为反应模式与影响因素——以芦山地震为例

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1118

1. 西南交通大学公共管理与政法学院, 成都 610031
2. 西南交通大学经济管理学院, 成都 610031
3. 香港中文大学工商管理学院, 香港 999077

English Abstract

Individual's Immediately Behavioral Responses Modes and Influencing Factors in Earthquake-The Case of Lushan Earthquake

1. School of Public Administration and Law, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
2. School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
3. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Business School, Hongkong 999077, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

留言板

地震灾时个体行为反应模式与影响因素——以芦山地震为例

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1118

Individual's Immediately Behavioral Responses Modes and Influencing Factors in Earthquake-The Case of Lushan Earthquake

计量

出版历程

地震灾时个体行为反应模式与影响因素——以芦山地震为例

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1118

1. 西南交通大学 公共管理与政法学院, 成都 6100312. 西南交通大学 经济管理学院, 成都 6100313. 香港中文大学 工商管理学院, 香港 999077

English Abstract

Individual's Immediately Behavioral Responses Modes and Influencing Factors in Earthquake-The Case of Lushan Earthquake

1. School of Public Administration and Law, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China2. School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China3. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Business School, Hongkong 999077, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

1. 西南交通大学公共管理与政法学院, 成都 610031
2. 西南交通大学经济管理学院, 成都 610031
3. 香港中文大学工商管理学院, 香港 999077

1. School of Public Administration and Law, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
2. School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
3. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Business School, Hongkong 999077, China