绿色投资者对企业资本成本的影响

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1353

彭斌¹,
彭绯²

1.
北京建筑大学经济与管理工程学院, 北京 100044
2.
大不列颠哥伦比亚大学电子工程系, 温哥华 V6T1Z4

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（71002098）;中国博士后特别资助项目（2010198）;青年英才计划项目资助（YETP1652）

Impact of Green Investors on Corporate Capital Cost

PENG Bin¹,
PENG Fei²

1.
School of Engineering Economic Management, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China
2.
Electrical & Computer Engineering, UBC, Vancouver, B.C. V6T1Z4, Canada

摘要:基于投资者价值最大化，立足企业特性划分和投资偏好均衡构建清洁化改革模型并通过参数模拟来考察企业资本成本的绿色投资者异质性反应，改革成本是否会提高该反应。研究发现：（1）绿色投资者对污染、改革企业资本成本有显著影响，而对清洁企业没有影响，改革成本强化了绿色投资者促进企业清洁化改革以及影响资本成本；（2）污染企业进入清洁化改革前，绿色投资者不存在时综合资本成本最低，随着绿色投资者增加污染企业股价下降，资本成本提高，绿色投资者对综合资本成本产生消极影响；（3）一旦触及最大值，污染企业进入清洁化改革，绿色投资者对综合资本成本产生积极影响，改革加速，综合资本成本下滑，改革企业份额攀升，全是绿色投资者时污染企业完成清洁化改革，改革企业份额最大，综合资本成本最低。
- 绿色投资者/
- 资本成本/
- 清洁化改革模型/
- 改革成本
Abstract:From the perspective of investors value maximization,clean reform model was established based on corporate characteristics divided and investment preference equilibrium and parameters simulation to explore the impact of green investor on capital cost of corporate capital cost as well as whether reform cost raised these impacts. Research results showed as follows:(1)the effect of green investors on capital cost for pollution and reform corporate were significant while it was yet not for clean corporate. Reform cost strengthened the influence of green investors on corporate capital cost and corporate cleaning reform;(2)Before pollution enterprise entered into cleaning reform,it was negative relationship between green investors and comprehensive capital cost. Even though comprehensive capital cost was the lowest in the neutral investors market,green investor was induced by ethical concept to boycott pollution corporate,so its share price deduced and capital cost increased;(3)Once comprehensive cost was maximum,pollution corporate entered into cleaning reform. After that it was positive relationship between green investors and comprehensive capital cost. With the increase of green investors,reform accelerated,the comprehensive capital cost gradually reduced,the proportion of reform enterprise increased. As all the investors were green,pollution corporate finished cleaning reform,the proportion of reform enterprise was maximum,comprehensive capital.cost was minimum.
- green investor/
- capital cost/
- cleaning reform model/
- reform cost

[1]	MCWILLIAMS A,SIEGEL D. Corporate social responsibility:a theory of the firm perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review,2001,26(1):117-127.
[2]	RUSSO M V,FOUTS P A. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997,49(6):534-559.
[3]	JONES T. Instrumental stakeholder theory:a synthesis of ethics and economics[J]. Academy of Management Review,1995,20(2):404-437.
[4]	STATMAN M. Socially responsible mutual funds[J]. Financial Analyst Journal,2000,56(3):30-39.
[5]	SCHUETH S. Socially responsible investing in the United States[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2003,43(3):189-194.
[6]	BAUER R,KOEDIJK K,OTTEN R. International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance,2005,29(7):1751-1767.
[7]	BARNEA A,HEINKEL R,KRAUS A. Green investors and corporate investment[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2005,16(3):332-343.
[8]	BRANCO M C,RODRIGUES L L. Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2006,69(2):111-132.
[9]	VAN B P,COSSLING T. The worth of values:a literature review on the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2008,82(2):407-424.
[10]	郑若帽,胡璐. 我国社会责任投资策略与绩效分析[J]. 经济管理,2014,36(5):163-174.
[11]	孔伟杰. 制造业企业转型升级影响因素研究——基于浙江省制造业企业大样本问卷调查的实证研究[J]. 管理世界,2012(9):120-131.
[12]	王少梅. 什么绑架了中国实体经济的稳态增长[J]. 宏观经济研究,2014(12):67-73.
[13]	WANG D,LI S,SUEYOSHI T. DEA environmental assessment on US industrial sectors:investment for improvement in operational and environmental performance to attain corporate sustainability[J]. Energy Economics,2014,45:254-267.
[14]	马虹.李杰. 社会责任投资的避险效应和预期误差效应——基于产品市场竞争的视角[J]. 中国工业经济,2015(3):109-121.
[15]	KAUSTIA M,TORSTILA S. Stock market aversion?political preferences and stock market participation[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2011,100(1):98-112.
[16]	李姝,赵颖,童婧. 社会责任报告降低了企业权益资本成本吗?——来自中国资本市场的经验证据[J]. 会计研究,2013(9):64-71.
[17]	ROBERTO A,ALBERTO M. Green tangible investment strategies and export performance:a firm-level investigation[J]. Ecological Economics,Ecological Economics,2014,108:150-161.
[18]	GAO W,NG L,WANG Q. Does corporate headquarters location matter for corporate capital structure?[J]. Financial Manage,2011,40:113-138.
[19]	ADAMS R B,FUNK P. Beyond the glass ceiling:does gender matter?[J]. Management Science,2012,58(2):219-235.
[20]	HONG H,KOSTOVETSKY L. Red and blue investing:values and finance[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2012,103(1):1-19.
[21]	FLAMMER C. Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance?a regression discontinuity approach[J]. Management Science,2015,61(11):2549-2568.
[22]	DI GIULI A,KOSTOVETSKY L. Are red or blue companies more likely to go green?politics and corporate social responsibility[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2014,111(1):158-180.
[23]	BANERJEE S,GREEN B. Signal or noise? uncertainty and learning about whether other traders are informed[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2015,117(2):398-423.
[24]	MARTIN P R,MOSER D V. Managers' green investment disclosures and investors' reaction[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2016,61(1):239-254.
[25]	MARIO D A,MORTEN B. Corporate governance and green innovation[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2016,75:54-72.
[26]	丁小东,庄河,黄修莉,蒋葛夫,李涛. 基于CARA效用函数的报童决策偏差形成机理[J]. 控制与决策,2016,31(2):287-296.

[1]	范柏乃, 韩飞, 陈韶晖, 郭芸.政府绩效管理元评估的成本收益模型与实证检验. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(2): 133-140.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.4115
[2]	张文静, 马喜立.以环境税治理雾霾的减排效果及减排成本——基于动态多区域CGE模型. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(3): 36-47.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.2085
[3]	尹海员, 吴兴颖.投资者日度情绪、超额收益率与市场流动性——基于DCC-GARCH模型的时变相关性研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (5): 76-87,114.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1776
[4]	周耀东, 王嘉熙.北京机动车环境外部成本的测算. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (6): 28-37.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0369
[5]	赵晓丽, 蔡琼, 胡雅楠.中国火电产业环境外部成本分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (1): 10-17.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0102
[6]	杨宇静, 李晓秋.美国清洁能源的专利制度改革及其对中国的启示. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2014, (3): 125-131.
[7]	焦建玲, 刘晓凡, 朱俊红.中国石油依赖经济成本的Monte Carlo模拟. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (4): 1-6.
[8]	郭堃, 杨卫东.海外投资者的外交保护及困境——以国籍原则为中心. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (2): 131-137.
[9]	丁斌, 徐俊.委托代理理论下应急物资库存成本控制. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (2): 45-50.
[10]	丁斌, 雷秀, 孙连禄.应急物资储备方式选择与成本分摊问题. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2011, (6): 73-78.
[11]	王治彪.论国民经济动员经济成本. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2011, (5): 65-67.
[12]	曲大成.高校科研经费间接成本补偿机制改革问题探讨. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2011, (6): 58-62.
[13]	赵瑾璐, 张璐超.国有商业银行引入战略投资者原因及条件的理论分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2008, (1): 45-48.
[14]	严玲, 周国栋.基于项目治理理论的政府投资项目代建制改革分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2008, (6): 44-49.
[15]	孙健.综合化与实践化——我国高等工程教育课程改革的趋势. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2007, (1): 110-112.
[16]	赵士德, 田金信, 万立军.知识型员工激励成本最优分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2007, (3): 88-91.
[17]	林春燕, 朱东华.我国机构投资者认知偏差的实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2006, (3): 54-57.
[18]	刘超, 韩泽县.投资者情绪和上证综指关系的实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2006, (2): 57-60.
[19]	高茵.高等教育投资体制及预算管理改革的思路. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2005, (4): 58-60.
[20]	程隆云.企业环境成本核算若干问题的思考. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2005, (1): 40-44.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:721
HTML全文浏览量:0
PDF下载量:465
被引次数:0

留言板

绿色投资者对企业资本成本的影响

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1353

Impact of Green Investors on Corporate Capital Cost

计量

绿色投资者对企业资本成本的影响

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1353

1. 北京建筑大学经济与管理工程学院, 北京 100044
2. 大不列颠哥伦比亚大学电子工程系, 温哥华 V6T1Z4

English Abstract

Impact of Green Investors on Corporate Capital Cost

1. School of Engineering Economic Management, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China
2. Electrical & Computer Engineering, UBC, Vancouver, B.C. V6T1Z4, Canada

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

留言板

绿色投资者对企业资本成本的影响

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1353

Impact of Green Investors on Corporate Capital Cost

计量

出版历程

绿色投资者对企业资本成本的影响

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1353

1. 北京建筑大学 经济与管理工程学院, 北京 1000442. 大不列颠哥伦比亚大学 电子工程系, 温哥华 V6T1Z4

English Abstract

Impact of Green Investors on Corporate Capital Cost

1. School of Engineering Economic Management, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China2. Electrical & Computer Engineering, UBC, Vancouver, B.C. V6T1Z4, Canada

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

1. 北京建筑大学经济与管理工程学院, 北京 100044
2. 大不列颠哥伦比亚大学电子工程系, 温哥华 V6T1Z4

1. School of Engineering Economic Management, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China
2. Electrical & Computer Engineering, UBC, Vancouver, B.C. V6T1Z4, Canada