高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

非期望环境行为的类型及其行为呈现——调节聚焦影响视角

陈飞宇,陈红,龙如银

downloadPDF
文章导航> bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）> 2017> (5): 28-36
陈飞宇, 陈红, 龙如银. 非期望环境行为的类型及其行为呈现——调节聚焦影响视角[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (5): 28-36. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1372
引用本文: 陈飞宇, 陈红, 龙如银. 非期望环境行为的类型及其行为呈现——调节聚焦影响视角[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (5): 28-36.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1372
shu
CHEN Feiyu, CHEN Hong, LONG Ruyin. Undesired Environmental Behavior and its Presentation-The Impact to Regulatory Focus[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (5): 28-36. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1372
Citation: CHEN Feiyu, CHEN Hong, LONG Ruyin. Undesired Environmental Behavior and its Presentation-The Impact to Regulatory Focus[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (5): 28-36.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1372
shu

非期望环境行为的类型及其行为呈现——调节聚焦影响视角

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1372
  • 1.

    中国矿业大学 管理学院, 江苏 徐州 221116

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（71473248，71273258，71473247，71673271，71603255，71603257）;江苏省"青蓝工程"项目资助（2012）;江苏省"333高层次bob真人app下载工程"项目资助（2016）;中国矿业大学第八批优秀创新团队项目资助（2015ZY003）;江苏省研究生教育教学改革研究与实践课题（JGZZ16_078）;江苏省社科基金基地项目资助（14JD026）;江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目（KYLX16_0513）

Undesired Environmental Behavior and its Presentation-The Impact to Regulatory Focus

  • 1.

    School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221116, China

  • 摘要:将漠视性和破坏性行为加以整合，提出"非期望环境行为"的概念，区分了非期望环境行为的3种类型：自发型、跟随型、防御型，并探讨了其行为呈现。鉴于行为与个体心理偏好及关注点的相关性，进一步分析调节聚焦对非期望环境行为的影响。通过对474名大学生的调查与分析显示：个体非期望环境行为总体发生率为50.5%，具有高发特征，其中自发型非期望环境行为发生率达32.9%，占比最高；常态发生（得分>=4）非期望环境行为的个体占比为21.0%，其中46.3%为防御型非期望环境行为；预防聚焦对非期望环境行为总体有显著负向预测作用，促进聚焦对跟随型非期望环境行为有显著负向预测作用；调节聚焦为"双低型"的个体，最容易发生非期望环境行为，且出现"翘尾"现象。据此，从非期望环境行为发生动机出发，结合调节聚焦的影响特征对非期望环境行为的干预提出建议。
    Abstract:Disregard behavior and destructive behavior were reorganized in this study to put forward the concept of undesired environmental behavior,then we distinguished three types of undesired environmental behavior,including spontaneous,followed and defensive and explored their presentation format. Given the relationship between behaviors and individual psychological preference or concerns,the influence of regulatory focus on undesired environmental behavior was analyzed in further. According to 474 data from undergraduates,the findings indicated that the overall incidence rate of individual environmental behavior was 50.5%,characterizing with high incidence,among which,the incidence rate of spontaneous undesired environmental behavior had the highest proportion of 32.9%; the incidence rate of normal undesired environmental behavior(the score was greater than or equal to 4) was 21.0%,with the incidence rate of defensive undesired environmental behavior accounting for 46.3%; the prevention focus had negative prediction effect on undesired environmental behavior,while the promotion focus had negative prediction effect on followed undesired environmental behavior; it was the easiest for individuals whose regulatory focus was double-low to perform undesired environmental behavior,characterizing with the phenomenon of "tail up". Based on this,from the perspective of behavior motivation,relevant recommendations were put forward combing the influence of regulatory focus on undesired environmental behavior.
  • [1] CROWE E,HIGGINS E T. Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations:promotion and prevention in decision-making[J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,1997,69(2):117-132.
    [2] HIGGINS E T. Promotion and prevention:regulatory focus as a motivational principle[J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,1998,30(2):1-46.
    [3] 姚琦,乐国安. 动机理论的新发展:调节定向理论[J]. 心理科学进展,2009,17(6):1264-1273.
    [4] HIGGINS E T. Beyond pleasure and pain[J]. American Psychologist,1997,52(12):1280-1300.
    [5] KARK R,VAN D D. Motivation to lead,motivation to follow:the role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes[J]. Academy of Management Review,2007,32(2):500-528.
    [6] BAAS M,DE D C K,NIJSTAD B A. A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research:hedonic tone,activation,or regulatory focus?[J]. Psychological Bulletin,2008,134(6):779-806.
    [7] LEE Y,KIM S,KIM M,et al. Antecedents and interrelationships of three types of pro-environmental behavior[J]. Journal of Business Research,2014,67(10):2097-2105.
    [8] CHEN H,WEI J,ZHU D,et al. How to achieve a low-carbon economy in China:from individual attitudes to actual consumption behaviors[J]. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal,2014.
    [9] CHEN H,LONG R,NIU W,et al. How does individual low-carbon consumption behavior occur?-an analysis based on attitude process[J]. Applied Energy,2014,116(5):376-386.
    [10] LOCKE E. Motivation,cognition,and action:an analysis of studies of task goals and knowledge[J]. Applied Psychology,2000,49(3):408-429.
    [11] COURBALAY A,DEROCHE T,PRIGENT E,et al. Big five personality traits contribute to prosocial responses to others' pain[J]. Personality & Individual Differences,2015,78(78):94-99.
    [12] 王国猛,黎建新,廖水香. 个人价值观,环境态度与消费者绿色购买行为关系的实证研究[J]. 软科学,2010,24(4):135-140.
    [13] COOKE S J,VERMAIRE J C. Environmental studies and environmental science today:inevitable mission creep and integration in action-oriented transdisciplinary areas of inquiry,training and practice[J]. Journal of Environmental Studies & Sciences,2015,5:70-78.
    [14] HADLER M,HALLER M. Global activism and nationally driven recycling:the influence of world society and national contexts on public and private environmental behavior[J]. International Sociology,2011,26(3):315-345.
    [15] JARKKO P,EMILIA V. Investor attention to the eurozone crisis and herding effects in national bank stock indexes[J]. Finance Research Letters,2015,14:111-116.
    [16] HUNG A A,PLOTT C R. Information cascades:replication and an extension to majority rule and conformity-rewarding institutions[J]. American Economic Review,2001,91(5):1508-1520.
    [17] DYNE L V,ANG S,BOTERO I C. Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2003,40(6):1359-1392.
    [18] DENIZ N,NOYAN A,ERTOSUNÖ G. The relationship between employee silence and organizational commitment in a private healthcare company[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013,99:691-700.
    [19] KOOB G F. Hedonic valence,dopamine and motivation[J]. Molecular Psychiatry,1996,1(3):186-9.
    [20] YIM Y C,YOO S C,SAUER P L,et al. Hedonic shopping motivation and co-shopper influence on utilitarian grocery shopping in superstores[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2014,42(5):528-544.
    [21] BUDISANTOSO T,BHATI A,BRADSHAW A,et al. Hedonic shopping motivation:does it really matter?[M] Springer Singapore,2016:51-64.
    [22] HIGGINS E T. How self-regulation creates distinct values:the case of promotion and prevention decision making[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology,2002,12(3):177-191.
    [23] HIGGINS E T. Making a good decision:value from fit[J]. American Psychologist,2000,55(11):1217-30.
    [24] AVNET T,HIGGINS E T. How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,2006,43(1):22-2437.
    [25] HAMSTRA M R W,KAI S,YPEREN N W V,et al. Followers feel valued-when leaders'regulatory focus makes leaders exhibit behavior that fits followers' regulatory focus[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2014,51:34-40.
    [26] KAMMERLANDER N,BURGER D,FUST A,et al. Exploration and exploitation in established small and medium-sized enterprises:the effect of CEOs' regulatory focus[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2015,30(4):582-602.
    [27] HIGGINS E T,FRIEDMAN R S,HARLOW R E,et al. Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success:promotion pride versus prevention pride[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology,2001,31(1):3-23.
    [28] 温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特. 结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J]. 心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194.
    [29] BRIJESH T. The mediation effect of outdoor recreation participation on environmental attitude-behavior correspondence[J]. Journal of Environmental Education,2010,41(3):133-150.
    [30] LEE T H,JAN F H,YANG C C. Conceptualizing and measuring environmentally responsible behaviors from the perspective of community-based tourists[J]. Tourism Management,2013,36:454-468.
    [31] 徐大伟,段姗姗,王佳宏,等. 我国大学生环境行为群体效应的实证研究——基于12所高校的调研数据分析[J]. 中国高教研究,2011(3):51-54.
    [32] MEYER A. Heterogeneity in the preferences and pro-environmental behavior of college students:the effects of years on campus,demographics,and external factors[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2015,112.
    [33] 王建明. 环境情感的维度结构及其对消费碳减排行为的影响-情感-行为的双因素理论假说及其验证[J]. 管理世界,2015(12):82-95.
    [34] ANJA K,JULIAN A. Mind the gap:why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?[J]. Environmental Education Research,2002,8(3):239-260.
    [35] ABRAHAM J,PANE M M,CHAIRIYANI R P. An investigation on cynicism and environmental self-efficacy as predictors of pro-environmental behavior[J]. Psychology,2015,06(3):234-242.
    [36] SUNGCHUL C,HYEONGSIK K. Putting behavior into context:exploring the contours of social capital influences on environmental behavior[J]. Environment and Behavior,2016.
    [37] MOOKHERJEE D,SOPHER B. Learning behavior in an experimental matching pennies game[J]. Games & Economic Behavior,1994,7(1):62-91.
    [38] BATTITI R,MASCIA F,BRUNATO M. Reinforcement learning[J]. Applied Artificial Intelligence,2008,15(7):665-685.
    [39] HIRAKATA A,OKUMI M,GRIESEMER A,et al. The effect of regulatory focus on idea generation and idea evaluation[J]. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity & the Arts,2011,5(1):13-20.
    [40] 李明军,高洁,王振宏,等. 调节聚焦倾向与教师创新工作行为:自主性与控制性动机的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究,2016(1):42-49.
  • [1] 武照亮, 靳敏.居民参与社区环境治理的行为研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2023, 25(1): 55-66.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.0791
    [2] 任广乾, 周雪娅, 李昕怡, 刘莉.产权性质、公司治理与企业环境行为. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(2): 44-55.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.5045
    [3] 俞毛毛, 马妍妍.环境规制抑制了企业金融化行为么？. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(2): 30-43.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.2846
    [4] 王晓红, 胡士磊, 张奔.环境污染对居民的政府信任和政治参与行为的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(2): 31-40.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.2509
    [5] 杨贤传, 张磊.媒体说服形塑与城市居民绿色购买行为——调节中介效应检验. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(3): 14-25.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1847
    [6] 王晓楠.阶层认同、环境价值观对垃圾分类行为的影响机制. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (3): 57-66.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.2592
    [7] 张浩, 涂国平.考虑偷排行为下的企业环境策略演化博弈——基于环境税收减征政策视角. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (4): 21-28.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1116
    [8] 毛建辉, 管超.环境规制、政府行为与产业结构升级. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (3): 1-10.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.2328
    [9] 赵国浩, 马明.地方政府环境规制竞争背景下地区间的企业污染排放行为. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (5): 1-9.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.2498
    [10] 涂国平, 张浩, 冷碧滨.基于企业治污行为的环境税率动态调整机制. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (1): 45-51.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.3494
    [11] 黄洁萍, 曹安琪.知识型众包社会大众参与行为动机及激励机制. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (4): 88-96.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.3253
    [12] 王晓楠.公众环境治理参与行为的多层分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (5): 37-45.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.5182
    [13] 金永生, 李吉音, 李朝辉.网络导向、价值共创与新创企业绩效——制度环境与企业发展阶段的调节. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (6): 70-78.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.2477
    [14] 陈江华.国有企业学习型组织构建的外部市场行为分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (4): 71-77.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0410
    [15] 王春峰, 余思婧, 房振明, 孙端.非预期广义信息到达与流动性动态行为研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (3): 77-82.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0311
    [16] 王仙雅, 毛文娟.消费者对企业社会责任缺失行为的感知——消费者归因和期望的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (6): 74-80,112.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0610
    [17] 张毅祥, 王兆华.基于计划行为理论的节能意愿影响因素——以知识型员工为例. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (6): 7-13.
    [18] 王春峰, 郑仲民, 房振明.中国证券市场跳跃行为非参数方法. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (2): 8-14.
    [19] 李彦青, 陈君.对滥用毒品行为非犯罪化的思考. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2009, (1): 15-20.
    [20] 杨沂, 李竟成.信息不对称、股东期望差异与企业家选择行为. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2008, (2): 29-34.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:881
  • HTML全文浏览量:2
  • PDF下载量:1573
  • 被引次数:0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-17
  • 刊出日期:2017-09-29

非期望环境行为的类型及其行为呈现——调节聚焦影响视角

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1372
  • 1. 中国矿业大学 管理学院, 江苏 徐州 221116
    • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目（71473248，71273258，71473247，71673271，71603255，71603257）;江苏省"青蓝工程"项目资助（2012）;江苏省"333高层次bob真人app下载工程"项目资助（2016）;中国矿业大学第八批优秀创新团队项目资助（2015ZY003）;江苏省研究生教育教学改革研究与实践课题（JGZZ16_078）;江苏省社科基金基地项目资助（14JD026）;江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目（KYLX16_0513）

  • 收稿日期:2016-07-17
  • 刊出日期:2017-09-29

摘要:将漠视性和破坏性行为加以整合，提出"非期望环境行为"的概念，区分了非期望环境行为的3种类型：自发型、跟随型、防御型，并探讨了其行为呈现。鉴于行为与个体心理偏好及关注点的相关性，进一步分析调节聚焦对非期望环境行为的影响。通过对474名大学生的调查与分析显示：个体非期望环境行为总体发生率为50.5%，具有高发特征，其中自发型非期望环境行为发生率达32.9%，占比最高；常态发生（得分>=4）非期望环境行为的个体占比为21.0%，其中46.3%为防御型非期望环境行为；预防聚焦对非期望环境行为总体有显著负向预测作用，促进聚焦对跟随型非期望环境行为有显著负向预测作用；调节聚焦为"双低型"的个体，最容易发生非期望环境行为，且出现"翘尾"现象。据此，从非期望环境行为发生动机出发，结合调节聚焦的影响特征对非期望环境行为的干预提出建议。

English Abstract

陈飞宇, 陈红, 龙如银. 非期望环境行为的类型及其行为呈现——调节聚焦影响视角[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (5): 28-36. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1372
引用本文: 陈飞宇, 陈红, 龙如银. 非期望环境行为的类型及其行为呈现——调节聚焦影响视角[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (5): 28-36.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1372
shu
CHEN Feiyu, CHEN Hong, LONG Ruyin. Undesired Environmental Behavior and its Presentation-The Impact to Regulatory Focus[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (5): 28-36. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1372
Citation: CHEN Feiyu, CHEN Hong, LONG Ruyin. Undesired Environmental Behavior and its Presentation-The Impact to Regulatory Focus[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (5): 28-36.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1372
shu
参考文献 (40)

目录

    /

      返回文章
      返回

        作者相关

        写作规范

        友情链接

        总访问量: 今日访问量:

        版权所有：bob手机在线登陆学术期刊中心

        主管单位: 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部 主办单位: bob手机在线登陆 地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街5号

        本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司开发  百度统计

        Baidu
        map