高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

组群层次下风险投资多边联盟的形成

罗超亮,符正平,王曦

downloadPDF
文章导航> bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）> 2018> (3): 60-70
罗超亮, 符正平, 王曦. 组群层次下风险投资多边联盟的形成[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (3): 60-70. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.1279
引用本文: 罗超亮, 符正平, 王曦. 组群层次下风险投资多边联盟的形成[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (3): 60-70.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.1279
shu
LUO Chaoliang, FU Zhengping, WANG Xi. Formation of Venture Capital Multilateral Alliance in Group-level[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, (3): 60-70. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.1279
Citation: LUO Chaoliang, FU Zhengping, WANG Xi. Formation of Venture Capital Multilateral Alliance in Group-level[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, (3): 60-70.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.1279
shu

组群层次下风险投资多边联盟的形成

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.1279
  • 1.

    中山大学 管理学院, 广东 广州 510275

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目资助（71372141，71302098）;广东省软科学项目资助（2017A070706011）

Formation of Venture Capital Multilateral Alliance in Group-level

  • 1.

    Business School, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou Guangdong 510275, China

  • 摘要:基于中国风险投资行业中的多边联合投资实践，以"组群"为单位探讨组群成员间的关系密度在不同情境下对组群成员组建多边联盟这一行为的影响。主要研究结论如下：第一，潜在合作伙伴之间的前期关系密度对于它们未来形成多边联盟具有重要的积极作用。第二，潜在合作伙伴之间的行业知识异质性显著增强了前期关系密度的正向效应，声誉异质性的影响并不显著。第三，关系断层显著增强了关系密度的正向作用。第四，地位断层并未显著增强关系密度的正向作用，但对多边联盟的形成却有正向的直接作用。
    Abstract:On the basis of the practice of multilateral alliances in Chinese venture capital industry, this paper explored the effect of prior co-investment ties density among a group of VC firms on the formation of multilateral alliance for these VC firms with different contextual conditions on group-level. There are some conclusions:firstly, prior tie density has a positive impact on the formation of multilateral alliance; secondly, the impact will be stronger when the knowledge heterogeneity or tie fault-line among potential VC firms is larger;thirdly, reputation heterogeneity or status fault-line doesn't positively affect the prior tie density, but it does have a positive effect on the formation of multilateral alliance, tie fault-lines have a positive impact on the formation of multilateral alliance.
  • [1] GULATI R.Social structure and alliance formation patterns:a longitudinal analysis[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1995,40(4):619-652.
    [2] POWELL W W,KOPUT K W,SMITH-DOERR L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation:networks of learning in biotechnology[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1996,41(1):116-145.
    [3] ZHANG L,GUPTA A. HALLEN B. The conditional importance of prior ties:a group-level analysis of venture capital syndication[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2017,60(4):1360-1386.
    [4] MAKINO S,CHAN C M,ISOBE T,BEAMISH P W. Intended and unintended termination of international joint ventures[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(11):1113-1132.
    [5] DAS T K,TENG B S. Alliance constellations:a social exchange perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review,2002,27(3):445-456.
    [6] ZENG M,CHEN X P. Achieving cooperation in multiparty alliances:a social dilemma approach to partnership management[J]. Academy of Management Review,2003,28(4):587-605.
    [7] LAVIE D,LECHNER C,SINGH H. The performance implications of timing of entry and involvement in multipartner alliances[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(3):578-604.
    [8] HEIDL R A,STEENSMA H K,PHELPS C. Divisive faultlines and the unplanned dissolutions of multipartner alliances[J]. Organization Science,2014,25(5):1351-1371.
    [9] LI D,EDEN L,HITT M A,IRELAND R D. Governance in multilateral R&D alliances[J]. Organization Science,2012,23(4):1191-1210.
    [10] SAKAKIBARA M. Formation of R&D consortia:industry and company effects[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(11):1033-1050.
    [11] LI D. Multilateral R&D alliances by new ventures[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2013,28(2):241-260.
    [12] ALBERS S,SCHWEIGER B,GIBB J. Complexity,power and timing in multipartner alliances:an integrative review and research agenda[C]. Managing Multipartner Strategic Alliance. New York:Information Age Publishing,2015:57-87.
    [13] DAVIS J P. The group dynamics of interorganizational relationships:collaborating with multiple partners in innovation ecosystems[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2016,61(4):621-661.
    [14] HOCHBERG Y V,LJUNGQVIST A,LU Y. Networking as a barrier to entry and the competitive supply of venture capital[J]. The Journal of Finance,2010,65(3):829-859.
    [15] SORENSON O,STUART T E. Bringing the context back in:settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,53(2):266-294.
    [16] MEULEMAN M,LOCKETT A,MANIGART S,WRIGHT M. Partner selection decisions in interfirm collaborations:the paradox of relational embeddedness[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2010,47(6):995-1019.
    [17] TRAPIDO D. Competitive embeddedness and the emergence of interfirm cooperation[J]. Social Forces,2007,86(1):165-191.
    [18] PAHNKE E C,MCDONALD R,WANG D,HALLEN B. Exposed:venture capital,competitor ties,and entrepreneurial innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2015,58(5):1334-1360.
    [19] GU Q,LU X. Unraveling the mechanisms of reputation and alliance formation:a study of venture capital syndication in China[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2014,35(5):739-750.
    [20] DIMOV D,MILANOV H. The interplay of need and opportunity in venture capital investment syndication[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2010,25(4):331-348.
    [21] LOCKETT A,WRIGHT M. The syndication of venture capital investments[J]. Omega,2001,29(5):375-390.
    [22] FERRARY M. Syndication of venture capital investment:the art of resource pooling[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2010,34(5):885-907.
    [23] 罗家德,邹亚琦,郭戎. 中国风险资本联合投资策略的差异化现象[J]. 现代财经(天津财经学院学报),2016(4):3-14.
    [24] MA D,RHEE M,YANG D. Power source mismatch and the effectiveness of interorganizational relations:the case of venture capital syndication[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2013,56(3):711-734.
    [25] JÄÄSKELÄINEN M. Venture capital syndication:synthesis and future directions[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews,2012,14(4):444-463.
    [26] AHUJA G. Collaboration networks,structural holes,and innovation:a longitudinal study[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2000,45(3):425-455.
    [27] CHUNG C C,BEAMISH P W. Multi-party international joint ventures:multiple post-formation change processes[J]. Journal of World Business,2012,47(4):648-663.
    [28] WASSMER U,DUSSAUGE P. Value creation in alliance portfolios:the benefits and costs of network resource interdependencies[J]. European Management Review,2011,8(1):47-64.
    [29] PHELPS C C. A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2010,53(4):890-913.
    [30] KHANNA T,RIVKIN J W. Interorganizational ties and business group boundaries:evidence from an emerging economy[J]. Organization Science,2006,17(3):333-352.
    [31] COLEMAN J S. Foundations of social theory[M]. Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1990.
    [32] KOGUT B,URSO P,WALKER G. Emergent properties of a new financial market:American venture capital syndication,1960-2005[J]. Management Science,2007,53(7):1181-1198.
    [33] DE CLERCQ D,DIMOV D. Internal knowledge development and external knowledge access in venture capital investment performance[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2008,45(3):585-612.
    [34] HEIMERIKS K H,DUYSTERS G. Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance:an empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2007,44(1):25-49.
    [35] BUSENITZ L W,FIET J O,MOESEL D D. Reconsidering the venture capitalists' "value added" proposition:an interorganizational learning perspective[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2004,19(6):787-807.
    [36] FOMBRUN C,SHANLEY M. What's in a name? reputation building and corporate strategy[J]. Academy of management Journal,1990,33(2):233-258.
    [37] LEE P M,POLLOCK T G,JIN K. The contingent value of venture capitalist reputation[J]. Strategic Organization,2011,9(1):33-69.
    [38] POLLOCK T G,LEE P M,JIN K,LASHLEY K.(Un) Tangled exploring the asymmetric coevolution of new venture capital firms'reputation and status[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2015,60(3):482-517.
    [39] POLZER J T,CRISP C B,JARVENPAA S L,KIM J W. Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams:how colocated subgroups can impair group functioning[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(4):679-692.
    [40] 党兴华,成泷,魏龙. 技术创新网络分裂断层对子群极化的影响研究——基于网络嵌入性视角[J]. 科学学研究,2016,33(5):781-792.
    [41] PODOLNY J M. Status signals:a sociological study of market competition[M]. NJ:Princeton University Press,2010.
    [42] THATCHER S M,PATEL P C. Group faultlines a review,integration,and guide to future research[J]. Journal of Management,2012,38(4):969-1009.
    [43] OZMEL U,REUER J J,GULATI R. Signals across multiple networks:how venture capital and alliance networks affect interorganizational collaboration[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2013,56(3):852-866.
    [44] HOCHBERG Y V,LJUNGQVIST A,LU Y. Whom you know matters:venture capital networks and investment performance[J]. The Journal of Finance,2007,62(1):251-301.
    [45] COWEN A P. An expanded model of status dynamics:the effects of status transfer and interfirm coordination[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2012,55(5):1169-1186.
    [46] HALLEN B L. The causes and consequences of the initial network positions of new organizations:from whom do entrepreneurs receive investmentsÄ[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,53(4):685-718.
    [47] BECKMAN C M,HAUNSCHILD P R. Network learning:the effects of partners'heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2002,47(1):92-124.
    [48] GULATI R,GARGIULO M. Where do interorganizational networks come fromÄ[J]. American journal of sociology,1999,104(5):1439-1493.
    [49] UZZI B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks:the paradox of embeddedness[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42(1):35-67.
    [50] 罗家德,秦朗,周伶. 中国风险投资产业的圈子现象[J]. 管理学报,2014,11(4):469-477.
  • [1] 陈琪昇.商事关系结构刍论. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, (): -.
    [2] 贾娟娟, 李健.投资视野下战略性企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(3): 168-180.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.2885
    [3] 张秀东, 王基铭.大型石化项目风险管理与项目绩效的关系. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(1): 41-52.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.4671
    [4] 曹玉平, 操一萍.风险投资、不良贷款与产业转型升级——基于中国省级面板数据的实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(3): 76-87.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1012
    [5] 董维佳, 吕一明.风险投资对中国新三板挂牌企业绩效的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(4): 81-89.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1864
    [6] 黄丽勤.论共犯关系之脱离. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (4): 119-122,129.
    [7] 董艳, 张大亮.供应商关系功能对关系质量的影响研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2009, (3): 43-48.
    [8] 刘芳, 姚弘芹.期刊编辑与作者关系浅谈. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2009, (4): 138-141.
    [9] 王慧, 洪瑾.公共危机管理与公信力关系分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2008, (5): 93-96.
    [10] 袁春红, 苏倪.新旧相邻关系解读——探析《物权法》中的相邻环境关系. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2007, (5): 26-28.
    [11] 孙树垒, 韩伯棠, 孙健全.企业与客户关系维度模型及契约关系分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2007, (3): 74-77.
    [12] 赵振武, 唐万生.模糊实物期权理论在风险投资项目价值评价中的应用. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2006, (1): 49-51.
    [13] 赵瑾璐, 安瑛晖, 张小霞.战略监管关系构建与银行风险管理体系再造. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2006, (4): 39-43.
    [14] 刘超, 韩泽县.投资者情绪和上证综指关系的实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2006, (2): 57-60.
    [15] 练娜, 夏恩君.管理层收购:一种风险投资退出方式. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2003, (5): 68-70.
    [16] 孙利.柳宗元与理学的关系. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2002, (4): 79-82.
    [17] 赵瑾璐, 张小霞.虚实资本的互动关系研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2001, (2): 58-61.
    [18] 刘丽萍, 夏恩君, 闫绪娴.风险投资与中小企业技术创新. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2001, (3): 42-44.
    [19] 樊昕宇, 徐磊.风险投资咨询网络化问题研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2001, (1): 64-67.
    [20] 洪瑾.人际关系与管理. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2000, (1): 56-57.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:515
  • HTML全文浏览量:1
  • PDF下载量:347
  • 被引次数:0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-28
  • 刊出日期:2018-04-28

组群层次下风险投资多边联盟的形成

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.1279
  • 1. 中山大学 管理学院, 广东 广州 510275
    • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金项目资助（71372141，71302098）;广东省软科学项目资助（2017A070706011）

  • 收稿日期:2017-05-28
  • 刊出日期:2018-04-28

摘要:基于中国风险投资行业中的多边联合投资实践，以"组群"为单位探讨组群成员间的关系密度在不同情境下对组群成员组建多边联盟这一行为的影响。主要研究结论如下：第一，潜在合作伙伴之间的前期关系密度对于它们未来形成多边联盟具有重要的积极作用。第二，潜在合作伙伴之间的行业知识异质性显著增强了前期关系密度的正向效应，声誉异质性的影响并不显著。第三，关系断层显著增强了关系密度的正向作用。第四，地位断层并未显著增强关系密度的正向作用，但对多边联盟的形成却有正向的直接作用。

English Abstract

罗超亮, 符正平, 王曦. 组群层次下风险投资多边联盟的形成[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (3): 60-70. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.1279
引用本文: 罗超亮, 符正平, 王曦. 组群层次下风险投资多边联盟的形成[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (3): 60-70.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.1279
shu
LUO Chaoliang, FU Zhengping, WANG Xi. Formation of Venture Capital Multilateral Alliance in Group-level[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, (3): 60-70. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.1279
Citation: LUO Chaoliang, FU Zhengping, WANG Xi. Formation of Venture Capital Multilateral Alliance in Group-level[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, (3): 60-70.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.1279
shu
参考文献 (50)

目录

    /

      返回文章
      返回

        作者相关

        写作规范

        友情链接

        总访问量: 今日访问量:

        版权所有：bob手机在线登陆学术期刊中心

        主管单位: 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部 主办单位: bob手机在线登陆 地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街5号

        本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司开发  百度统计

        Baidu
        map