Analysis about Elements of the Right of Administrative Action in the View of “the Theory about Layered Right of Action”——Based on the Relationship between the Doctrine about the Right of Action's Nature and the Element of the Right of Action
-
摘要:行政诉权要件乃当事人享有行政诉权所需具备之条件，其在判断当事人有无诉权、优化配置司法资源、过滤纠纷、为真正需要者提供救济等方面发挥举足轻重的作用。行政诉权要件受制于特定的诉权本质学说，且遵循"诉权本质学说→诉权内容→诉权要件"的研究思路。经由对既有行政诉权本质学说的反思与批判，可得出应在"诉权层次论"视域下界定行政诉权要件之结论。根据"诉权层次论"，行政诉权要件区别于起诉要件、诉讼要件、本案要件等与诉讼过程阶段化构造相关的诸要件，且具备自身的独特构造：第1层次行政诉权（起诉权）之要件为起诉要件；第2层次行政诉权（获得实体裁判权）之要件为行政纠纷可诉性、原告适格与狭义诉的利益；第3层次行政诉权（获得公正裁判权）缺乏独立的诉权要件。Abstract:The element of the right of administrative action, which plays an important role in determining whether the parties have the right of action, optimizing the allocation of judicial resources, filtering disputes, providing relief for those who really need it and so on, is a necessary condition for the parties concerned to obtain the right of administrative action. The element of the right of administrative action is subject to a specific doctrine about the right of action's nature, and follows the research idea:from the doctrine about the right of action's nature to the contents of the right of action, and then to the elements of the right of action. Through the reflection and criticism of the existing doctrine about the right of administrative action's nature, a conclusion can be drawn that the elements of the right of administrative action should be defined in the view of "The theory about layered right of action". According to "The theory about layered right of action", the element of the right of administrative action is different from elements which relate to the stage structure of litigation process, such as the requirement to sue, the requirement about a suit's legality, the requirement about a suit's justifiability and so on. The element of the right of administrative action has its own unique structure:the first layer of the right of administrative action is the right to sue, and the corresponding element is the requirement to sue; the second layer of the right of administrative action is the right to obtain the substantive trial, and the corresponding elements are the justiciability of administrative disputes, standing and the interest of litigation; the third layer of the right of administrative action is the right to obtain a fair trial, which lacks independent elements.
-
[1] 江伟,邵明,陈刚. 民事诉权研究[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2002. [2] 吕太郎. 诉之利益之判决[A]. 台湾民事诉讼法研究基金会.民事诉讼法之研讨(四)[C]. 台北:三民书局有限公司,1993. [3] 薛刚凌. 行政诉权研究[M]. 北京:华文出版社,1999. [4] 高家伟. 论行政诉权[J]. 政法论坛,1999(1):90-96. [5] 周永坤. 诉权法理研究论纲[J]. 中国法学,2004(5):11-24. [6] 马立群. 论行政诉权的构成要件与审查规则——行政诉权保障的路径及发展趋势[J]. 南京大学法律评论,2013(春季卷):38-51. [7] 相庆梅. 从逻辑到经验:民事诉权的一种分析框架[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2008. [8] 章剑生. 行政诉讼中滥用诉权的判定——陆红霞诉南通市发展和改革委员会政府信息公开答复案评释[J]. 交大法学,2017(2):168-176. [9] 林莉红. 中国行政诉讼的历史、现状与展望[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报,2013(2):18-39. [10] 梁君瑜. 行政诉讼阶段化构造改良论——基于程序正义与诉讼经济之双重价值诉求[J]. 广西社会科学,2017(3):80-85. [11] 中村英郎. 新民事诉讼法讲义[M]. 陈刚,林剑锋,郭美松,译.北京:法律出版社,2001. [12] 王甲乙,杨建华,郑健才. 民事诉讼法新论[M]. 台北:三民书局,1998. [13] 刘宗德. 制度设计型行政法学[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2013. [14] 新堂幸司. 新民事诉讼法[M]. 林剑锋,译.北京:法律出版社,2008. [15] 梁君瑜. 行政诉讼立案登记制的模式选择及其正当性[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛),2016(6):100-107. [16] DAVID S,ALEXANDRA F. Principles of administrative law[M]. London:The Cavendish Publishing Limited,1997. [17] 刘宗德,赖恒盈. 台湾地区行政诉讼:制度立法与案例[M]. 杭州:浙江大学出版社,2011. [18] 吴庚. 行政争讼法论[M]. 台北:自版,2008. [19] 段文波. 起诉条件前置审理论[J]. 法学研究,2016(6):70-87. [20] 高桥宏志. 重点讲义民事诉讼法[M]. 张卫平,许可,译. 北京:法律出版社,2007. [21] 杨建华,郑杰夫. 民事诉讼法要论[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2013. [22] 魏大喨. 诉讼基本权在民事诉讼法之实现[J]. 月旦法学杂志,2004(2):120-143. [23] 相庆梅. 民事诉权论[D]. 中国政法大学博士学位论文,2006. [24] 高桥宏志. 民事诉讼法:制度与理论的深层分析[M]. 林剑峰,译.北京:法律出版社,2004. [25] 蔡志方. 行政救济与行政法学(2)[M]. 台北:三民书局股份有限公司,1993. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数:665
- HTML全文浏览量:0
- PDF下载量:366
- 被引次数:0
下载:
