Comparative Analysis of the Legal Effect of Moral Conditions
-
摘要:法实证主义将法律效力的条件诉诸社会事实,与道德无关。该主张不能合理解释法律为什么有效,不能区分"守法义务"与"抢匪命令"。同时,该主张将法律效力诉诸于立法者的法律创制活动,由于创制的法律可能为恶,也可能为善,不能避免"恶法亦法"的实践困境;自然法学派主张法律有效必须满足道德条件,符合道德标准。该主张未能动摇哈特关于"法律与道德彼此之间并不存在概念上的必然联系",反驳了自然法学派关于道德对法律资格效力的影响;德沃金试图开辟第三条道路,重点关注道德如何影响和作用法律裁判实践与推理,即最终作为裁判根据的法律,需通过其建构性诠释中的"符合"与道德"证立"的双重检验,换言之,法律是从一组融贯的政治道德原则中推导出来,并为当下的法律实践提供了最佳的道德证立。法律与道德没有必然关联不等于法律可以独立于道德,法律与道德有必然关联也不意味着道德等于法律。Abstract:The law positivism believes that the legal effect condition appeals to the social fact,has nothing to do with morality.It cannot reasonably explain why the law is effective,it cannot distinguish between "compliance obligation" and "robber orders".At the same time,the author advocates that the legal effect should be brought to the legal creation of the legislator,because the legislator may be evil or good,and cannot avoid the practice dilemma of "evil law and law";The natural law school argues that the law must satisfy moral conditions and meet moral standards.But the claim has not been able to shake hart about "does not exist between law and morality conceptual connection",successfully against the natural law school of moral role and influence of the legal effect;Dworkin trying to open up the third way,focusing on how moral influence and role of adjudication practice and reasoning,which eventually as the referee according to law,through the constructive interpretation "in" and the moral of the double inspection of "moral",in short,the law of political moral principles from a set of melt injection,are derived and the present legal practice provides the best ethical moral. However,it is important to be aware of the role and influence of morality on legal effectivenes:legal and moral not necessarily correlation does not equal can be independent of the moral law,there is a correlation does not mean the moral law and morality is equal to the law.
-
Key words:
- the legal effect/
- moral conditions/
- methodism/
- matural law school/
- dworkin
-
[1] 哈特. 法律的概念[M]. 许家馨,李冠宜,译. 北京:法律出版社,2006. [2] JOHN F. Natural law and natural right[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2011. [3] JULES C. Negative and positive positivism[J]. Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence,Marshall Cohen,ed.London:Duckworth,1982(11):139-164. [4] 凯尔森. 法与国家的一般理论[M]. 沈宗灵,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2013. [5] 阿列克西. 法概念与法效力[M]. 王鹏翔,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2015. [6] SIECKMANN J.Rechtssystem und praktische vernunft:zur struktur einer normativen theorie des rechts[J].Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie,1992(78):146. [7] 雷磊. 再访拉德布鲁赫公式[J]. 法制与社会发展,2015(1):105-123. [8] 颜厥安. 法与实践理性[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003. [9] 奥斯丁. 法理学的范围[M]. 刘星,译. 北京:北京大学出版社,2013. [10] JOHN A. The province of jurisprudence determined[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press,1995:132-133. [11] JULES C. Rules and social facts[J]. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy,1991(14):705-706. [12] 马默. 法哲学[M]. 孙海波,王进,译. 北京:北京大学出版社,2014:12. [13] 康德. 纯粹理性批判[M]. 邓晓芒,译. 北京:人民出版社,2017:44. [14] HART H. Positivism and the separation of law and morals[J]. Harvard Law Review,1958(71):615-616. [15] 麦考密克. 大师学述:哈特[M]. 刘叶深,译. 北京:法律出版社,2010. [16] FULLER. Positivism and fidelity to law-a reply to professor Hart[J]. Harvard Law Review,1958(71):630-672. [17] JOSEPH R. The authority of law:essays on law and morality[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1979:38. [18] 拉兹. 公共领域中的伦理学——权威、法律与道德[C]. 葛四友,译. 南京:江苏人民出版社,2013. [19] 亚里士多德. 政治学[M]. 吴寿彭,译. 北京:商务印书馆,1965:202. [20] 比克斯. 法理学:理论与语境[M]. 邱邵继,译. 北京:法律出版社,2008:48. [21] 霍斯特. 法是什么[M]. 雷磊,译. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2017. [22] 富勒. 法律的道德性[M]. 郑戈,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2005. [23] MARK C M. Defect and deviance in natural law jurisprudence[M]. Institutionalized Reason:The Jurisprudence of Robert Alxey,Matthias Klatt,ed.,Oxford:Oxford University Press,2012:45-60. [24] 王鹏翔. 阿列克西《法概念与法效力》导读[M]//阿列克西. 法概念与法效力,北京:商务印书馆,2015. [25] DWORKIN. Justice in robes[M]. Cambridge:Belknap Dress of Harvard University Press,2006. [26] DWORKIN. Law's empire[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1986. [27] 马默. 解释与法律理论[M]. 程朝阳,译. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2012. [28] 波斯纳. 法理学问题[M]. 苏力,译. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002:29. -
![WeChat](http://www.frunetbio.com/journal/fileBJLGDXXBSKB/journal/article/bjlgdxxbshkxb/2018/5/PIC/wechat_cn_20180518.jpg)
计量
- 文章访问数:702
- HTML全文浏览量:0
- PDF下载量:413
- 被引次数:0