中国碳交易市场回顾与展望

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

中国碳交易市场回顾与展望

王科,陈沫

文章导航> bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）> 2018> (2): 24-31

王科, 陈沫. 中国碳交易市场回顾与展望[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (2): 24-31. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.5237

引用本文:

王科, 陈沫. 中国碳交易市场回顾与展望[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (2): 24-31.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.5237

WANG Ke, CHEN Mo. Review and Prospect of China's Carbon Trading System[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, (2): 24-31. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.5237

Citation:

WANG Ke, CHEN Mo. Review and Prospect of China's Carbon Trading System[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, (2): 24-31.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.5237

中国碳交易市场回顾与展望

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.5237

王科¹,
陈沫¹

1.
bob手机在线登陆管理与经济学院能源与环境政策研究中心, 北京 100081

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（71471018，71521002，71642004）;北京市社会科学基金研究基地项目资助（16JDGLB013）;国家重点研发计划项目资助（2016YFA0602603）

Review and Prospect of China's Carbon Trading System

WANG Ke¹,
CHEN Mo¹

1.
Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

摘要:2017年12月19日，首先纳入发电行业的全国碳排放权交易体系正式启动，1万吨标煤的准入门槛使全国碳市场几乎涵盖了所有主要火电企业。全国碳市场短期内虽然不会产生明显效果，但长期来看，将通过倒逼发电行业优化结构来促进低碳发展。对中国碳市场建设的相关政策发展及进程进行梳理，分析各个试点碳市场的市场表现及履约情况，通过对其配额和CCER交易情况进行总结，分析各个试点市场的政策效果，并对全国碳市场的发展进行展望。截至2017年12月底，全国7个试点的碳市场累计完成线上配额交易量逾1.35亿吨，达成交易额逾20亿元，为全国碳市场的建立积累了一定的经验。2017年，7个试点碳市场交易活跃度有所提高，但依然存在大量交易集中于履约期前后的情况。重庆碳市场一改以往低迷的市场表现，交易量和活跃度增加迅速；天津碳市场因全年长时间休市，交易量较低；湖北超过广东成为交易量最大的试点碳市场，交易集中度也为7个试点中最低。2018年是全国碳市场的基础建设期，各试点碳市场将继续并行运行，全国碳市场在实际的配额交易前将进行为期一年左右的模拟交易。碳市场的机制设计是一个需要不断完善的过程，要真正发挥全国碳市场降低碳减排成本和促进碳排放量下降的作用还需要至少两三年的时间。
- 碳排放权交易/
- 碳配额/
- 碳价
Abstract:On December 19,2017,the national carbon emissions trading system(ETS) was officially launched,which will firstly include only the power generation industry. With 10 000 tons of coal equivalent consumption as the entry threshold,China's national carbon market is bound to cover almost all the major thermoelectric enterprises. Although the national ETS would not have a significant impact in the short term,in the long run,it should push forward the low-carbon development by forcing the power generation industry to optimize its structure. This paper reviews the policy making progress and construction process of carbon market in China,analyzes the market performance of each pilot carbon market,summarizes the emission quota and CCER transactions,analyzes the effect of each pilot's ETS policy,and reviews and outlooks the development of the national ETS. By the end of December 2017,China's seven pilot carbon markets have accomplished more than 135 million tons of emission quota trading which accounts for more than 2 billion Chinese Yuan. This accumulated certain amount of experience for the establishment of the national ETS. In 2017,the transaction activity in the seven pilot carbon markets has increased. Nevertheless,there was still a large number of transactions concentrated around the compliance period. Chongqing's pilot carbon market performed much more active than before,which accomplished a rapidly increased trading volume and transaction activity. However,due to a long time without trading,Tianjin's pilot carbon market performed even worse in 2017. Hubei surpassed Guangdong to become the pilot carbon market with the largest trading volume and the lowest concentration of transactions. In 2018,the national ETS will be under construction,and during this period,these seven pilot carbon markets will continue to run simultaneously. There will be yearlong simulated transaction before the actual emission quota trading. The mechanism design of the carbon market is a process that needs continuous improvement,which will take at least two or three years for the carbon market to play its role in reducing the cost of carbon emission reduction as well as reducing the carbon emissions in China.
- carbon emissions trading system/
- carbon allowances/
- carbon price

[1]	SCHMALENSEE R,STAVINS R N. Lessons learned from three decades of experience with cap and trade[J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy,2017,11(1):59-79.
[2]	WANG K,ZHANG X,YU X,WEI Y,WANG B. Emissions trading and abatement cost savings:an estimation of China's thermal power industry[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2016,65:1005-1017.

[1]	王兆华.《碳交易效率与企业减排决策研究》评介. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(1): 187-188.
[2]	王科, 李思阳.中国碳市场回顾与展望(2022). bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(2): 33-42.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.0271
[3]	赵昕, 曹森, 丁黎黎.互联网依赖对家庭碳排放的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(4): 49-59.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.3482
[4]	余碧莹, 赵光普, 安润颖, 陈景明, 谭锦潇, 李晓易.碳中和目标下中国碳排放路径研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(2): 17-24.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.7380
[5]	王科, 刘永艳.2020年中国碳市场回顾与展望. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(2): 10-19.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.7418
[6]	徐文成, 毛彦军.碳税改革的低碳发展效应. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (2): 30-37.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.5620
[7]	马晓微, 陈丹妮, 兰静可, 李川东.收入差距与居民消费碳排放关系. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (6): 1-9.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.2117
[8]	张宁, 刘青君.碳交易减少了中国火电厂的减排成本吗?——基于2005-2010年面板数据的实证分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (1): 7-16.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.3166
[9]	王琛.碳配额约束对企业竞争力的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (1): 47-55.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0107
[10]	梁晓捷, 王兵, 张皓, 唐葆君.钢铁行业能源效率与碳排放. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (2): 34-38.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0207
[11]	陆菊春, 张瑞雪.碳排放权初始分配中防范企业逆向选择的演化博弈. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (4): 28-35.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0404
[12]	王芹鹏, 赵道致.竞争市场中生产与碳交易策略. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (1): 54-61.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0108
[13]	马晓微, 杜佳, 叶奕, 徐漫.中美居民消费直接碳排放核算及比较. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (4): 34-40.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0405
[14]	丁志刚, 徐琪.碳限额与交易政策下供应链低碳技术投资时机研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (5): 9-14.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0502
[15]	朱帮助.国际碳市场价格驱动力研究——以欧盟排放交易体系为例. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2014, (3): 22-29.
[16]	肖峰, 郑煜.论欧盟航空排放交易规则下的管辖权冲突——从欧盟法院航空碳税案说起. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (4): 106-111.
[17]	王科, 李默洁.碳排放配额分配的DEA建模与应用. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (4): 7-13,20.
[18]	滕欣, 李健, 刘广为.中国碳排放预测与影响因素分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (5): 11-18.
[19]	范体军, 杨鉴, 骆瑞玲.碳排放交易机制下减排技术投资的生产库存. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (6): 14-21.
[20]	程志超, 王丹, 沈佩龙, 季晓明, 申薇.碳交易给我国节能减排目标带来的风险与机遇. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2011, (6): 37-40.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:705
HTML全文浏览量:1
PDF下载量:1153
被引次数:0

中国碳交易市场回顾与展望

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.5237

王科¹,
陈沫¹

1. bob手机在线登陆管理与经济学院能源与环境政策研究中心, 北京 100081

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（71471018，71521002，71642004）;北京市社会科学基金研究基地项目资助（16JDGLB013）;国家重点研发计划项目资助（2016YFA0602603）

收稿日期:2018-01-24
刊出日期:2018-03-20

关键词:

碳排放权交易/

碳配额/

碳价

摘要:2017年12月19日，首先纳入发电行业的全国碳排放权交易体系正式启动，1万吨标煤的准入门槛使全国碳市场几乎涵盖了所有主要火电企业。全国碳市场短期内虽然不会产生明显效果，但长期来看，将通过倒逼发电行业优化结构来促进低碳发展。对中国碳市场建设的相关政策发展及进程进行梳理，分析各个试点碳市场的市场表现及履约情况，通过对其配额和CCER交易情况进行总结，分析各个试点市场的政策效果，并对全国碳市场的发展进行展望。截至2017年12月底，全国7个试点的碳市场累计完成线上配额交易量逾1.35亿吨，达成交易额逾20亿元，为全国碳市场的建立积累了一定的经验。2017年，7个试点碳市场交易活跃度有所提高，但依然存在大量交易集中于履约期前后的情况。重庆碳市场一改以往低迷的市场表现，交易量和活跃度增加迅速；天津碳市场因全年长时间休市，交易量较低；湖北超过广东成为交易量最大的试点碳市场，交易集中度也为7个试点中最低。2018年是全国碳市场的基础建设期，各试点碳市场将继续并行运行，全国碳市场在实际的配额交易前将进行为期一年左右的模拟交易。碳市场的机制设计是一个需要不断完善的过程，要真正发挥全国碳市场降低碳减排成本和促进碳排放量下降的作用还需要至少两三年的时间。

English Abstract

Review and Prospect of China's Carbon Trading System

WANG Ke¹,
CHEN Mo¹

1. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Received Date:2018-01-24
Publish Date:2018-03-20

Keywords:

Abstract:On December 19,2017,the national carbon emissions trading system(ETS) was officially launched,which will firstly include only the power generation industry. With 10 000 tons of coal equivalent consumption as the entry threshold,China's national carbon market is bound to cover almost all the major thermoelectric enterprises. Although the national ETS would not have a significant impact in the short term,in the long run,it should push forward the low-carbon development by forcing the power generation industry to optimize its structure. This paper reviews the policy making progress and construction process of carbon market in China,analyzes the market performance of each pilot carbon market,summarizes the emission quota and CCER transactions,analyzes the effect of each pilot's ETS policy,and reviews and outlooks the development of the national ETS. By the end of December 2017,China's seven pilot carbon markets have accomplished more than 135 million tons of emission quota trading which accounts for more than 2 billion Chinese Yuan. This accumulated certain amount of experience for the establishment of the national ETS. In 2017,the transaction activity in the seven pilot carbon markets has increased. Nevertheless,there was still a large number of transactions concentrated around the compliance period. Chongqing's pilot carbon market performed much more active than before,which accomplished a rapidly increased trading volume and transaction activity. However,due to a long time without trading,Tianjin's pilot carbon market performed even worse in 2017. Hubei surpassed Guangdong to become the pilot carbon market with the largest trading volume and the lowest concentration of transactions. In 2018,the national ETS will be under construction,and during this period,these seven pilot carbon markets will continue to run simultaneously. There will be yearlong simulated transaction before the actual emission quota trading. The mechanism design of the carbon market is a process that needs continuous improvement,which will take at least two or three years for the carbon market to play its role in reducing the cost of carbon emission reduction as well as reducing the carbon emissions in China.

王科, 陈沫. 中国碳交易市场回顾与展望[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (2): 24-31. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.5237

引用本文:

王科, 陈沫. 中国碳交易市场回顾与展望[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (2): 24-31.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.5237

Citation:

WANG Ke, CHEN Mo. Review and Prospect of China's Carbon Trading System[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, (2): 24-31.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.5237

参考文献 (2)