家庭生活用能调查方案的国际比较及启示

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

家庭生活用能调查方案的国际比较及启示

廖华,伍敬文

文章导航> bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）> 2019> (5): 11-18

廖华, 伍敬文. 家庭生活用能调查方案的国际比较及启示[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (5): 11-18. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.7436

引用本文:

廖华, 伍敬文. 家庭生活用能调查方案的国际比较及启示[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (5): 11-18.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.7436

LIAO Hua, WU Jingwen. Household Energy Consumption Survey: International Comparison and Implications[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2019, (5): 11-18. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.7436

Citation:

LIAO Hua, WU Jingwen. Household Energy Consumption Survey: International Comparison and Implications[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2019, (5): 11-18.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.7436

家庭生活用能调查方案的国际比较及启示

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.7436

廖华¹,
伍敬文¹

1.
bob手机在线登陆管理与经济学院能源与环境政策研究中心, 北京 100081

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划课题"能源结构对碳排放强度的作用规律及参数化"（2016YFA0602801）;国家自然科学基金面上项目"农户燃料选择行为及其对健康和社会经济的影响研究"（71673026）

Household Energy Consumption Survey: International Comparison and Implications

LIAO Hua¹,
WU Jingwen¹

1.
Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100181, China

摘要:家庭用能与生产部门用能有不同的影响机制，很多国家开展了家庭用能抽样调查。从调查机构、调查频率、调查对象、调查内容、抽样方法、数据采集、质量控制、数据发布和开放使用等方面对部分国家和国际组织的家庭用能调查方案作出比较和总结。大型的家庭用能调查多由政府主导，且通常是居民生活或住房调查的组成部分，家庭能源专项调查较少。调查内容不仅包括不同能源品种的使用量信息，还区分最终用途。调查手段以入户调查为主，网上调查、邮寄调查和电话调查为辅。现代信息技术为提高调查效率和数据质量提供了重要保障。现有调查中大多数没实现追踪调查。与非官方调查相比，广泛调查数据具有样本大、覆盖面广、抽样科学、可共享等特点。发达国家和发展中国家在调查意识、内容和数据使用方面差异较大。目前中国居民能源调查还不完善，建议在现有的住户调查基础上逐步推进能源调查。
- 家庭生活用能/
- 能源调查/
- 国际比较
Abstract:Energy consumption between the household sector and production sectors have different impact mechanisms,and many countries have conducted household energy consumption surveys. This paper compares and summarizes several household energy consumption programs conducted by some countries or international organizations from survey institutions,survey frequency,survey objects,survey content,sampling methods,data collection,quality control,data release,and open use. Large-scale household energy consumption surveys are mostly government-led and are often part of residential living or housing surveys,with fewer specialized surveys. The survey includes not only the usage information of different energy types but also energy used for various family activities. The survey method is mainly based on face to face interview,supplemented by online surveys,mail surveys and telephone surveys. Modern information technology provides an important guarantee for improving survey efficiency and data quality. Most of the existing surveys did not implement tracking investigations. Compared with unofficial surveys,large-scale survey data has the characteristics of large sample size,wide coverage,scientific sampling,and shareability. Developed and developing countries differ greatly in their survey awareness,content and use of data. There is no specialized household energy consumption survey in China,and it is recommended to gradually promote it based on existing household surveys.
- household energy consumption/
- survey scheme of energy consumption/
- international comparison

[1]	IEA. World energy balances 2018[M]. Paris:International Energy Agency,2018.
[2]	EIA. Residential energy consumption survey(RECS)[N/OL].(2010-10-20)[2018-05-07].Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/about.php.
[3]	DECC. Community energy survey[N/OL]. (2014-02-12)[2018-05-10].Department of Energy & Climate Change.https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/279089/DECC_Community_Energy_Strategy_Survey_v3.pdf.
[4]	DECC. Household electricity survey[N/OL]. (2012-05-12)[2018-05-10]. Department of Energy & Climate Change. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/208097/10043_R66141HouseholElectricitySu-rveyFinalReportissue4.pdf.
[5]	DCLG. English housing survey[N/OL].(2013-07-10)[2018-05-22]. Ministry of Housing,Communities & Local Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/English-housing-survey.
[6]	DEATON A. The analysis of household surveys:a microeconometric approach to development policy[M]. Baltimore and London:The Johns Hopkins University Press,Published for the World Bank,1997.
[7]	SWAN L G,UGURSAL V I,BEAUSOLEIL-MORRISON I. Occupant related household energy consumption in Canada:estimation using a bottom-up neural-network technique[J]. Energy and Buildings,2011,43(2):326-337.
[8]	BHATTACHARYYA S C. Influence of India's transformation on residential energy demand[J]. Applied Energy,2015,143:228-237.
[9]	PARIKH K S,PARIKH J K. Realizing potential savings of energy and emissions from efficient household appliances in India[J]. Energy Policy,2016,97:102-111.
[10]	GUNDIMEDA H,KÖHLIN G. Fuel demand elasticities for energy and environmental policies:Indian sample survey evidence[J]. Energy Economics,2008,30(2):517-546.
[11]	GROGAN L,SADANAND A. Rural electrification and employment in poor countries:evidence from Nicaragua[J]. World Development,2013,43:252-265.
[12]	MENSAH J T,ADU G. An empirical analysis of household energy choice in Ghana[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2015,51:1402-1411.
[13]	廖华. 中国农村居民生活用能现状、问题与应对[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版),2019,21(2):1-5.
[14]	李慷,王科,王亚璇. 中国区域能源贫困综合评价[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版),2014,16(2):1-12.
[15]	廖华,唐鑫,魏一鸣. 能源贫困研究现状与展望[J]. 中国软科学,2015(8):58-71.

[1]	王萍, 徐梦婷, 刘姣, 张金锁.农村生活用能对老年人健康的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(5): 31-42.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.3342
[2]	王萍, 徐梦婷, 刘姣, 李逸明, 张金锁.农村生活用能、老年人健康风险与“贫困陷阱”. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, (): -.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.3342
[3]	廖华.中国农村居民生活用能现状、问题与应对. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (2): 1-5.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.7300
[4]	方胜, 卢新生, 刘笑.国际原油价格变化对中美能源股影响的断点研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (4): 36-42.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1922
[5]	李苏秀, 刘颖琦, ARI Kokko.新能源汽车产业公众意识培育策略——北京数据与国际经验. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (3): 57-66.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1995
[6]	赵振宇, 汤超.国际工程承包商生态位测度与分析——基于ENR国际承包商250/225强的实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (1): 62-72.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0109
[7]	邹艳芬.“区域能源消费”研究框架的国内外比较——基于共词分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (5): 36-45.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0505
[8]	田玲, 姚鹏.养老保险与家庭消费:基于中国综合社会调查的实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (5): 69-76.
[9]	许涤龙, 钟雄, 汤智斌.能源统计的国际准则——IRES及其启示. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2014, (2): 33-39.
[10]	孙岩.家庭异质性因素对城市居民能源使用行为的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (5): 23-28.
[11]	李金铠, 沈波, 韩亚峰, 张孟豪.中国区域能源效率比较——基于DEA-Malmquist和聚类分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (6): 1-6.
[12]	陈江生, 李文辉, 张耀启, 连晋姣.农村劳动力流动模式对家庭生活福利的影响——基于陕西、河南两省城乡随机调查数据的实证分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (4): 37-42.
[13]	周超, 刘云.主权财富基金类型及与国际典型基金的比较. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2011, (2): 56-58,80.
[14]	于兆波, 杨霖.从国内法与国际法的比较看国际法的等级性. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2010, (2): 78-81.
[15]	聂红, 董瑾.中印计算机和信息服务贸易国际竞争力的比较研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2008, (4): 24-26.
[16]	李艳华, 赵黎明, 冯斌.基于国际比较的我国低成本航空发展前景预测. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2007, (5): 56-59.
[17]	厉斌, 王春峰.证券市场量价关系的国际比较研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2005, (4): 51-54.
[18]	李仅.企业所得税的国际比较. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2003, (4): 59-62.
[19]	杨志坚, 刘筠筠.大学生法制观念的跟踪调查和比较研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2002, (3): 55-58.
[20]	金永生.公司治理结构的国际比较及发展趋势研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2001, (4): 31-34.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:730
HTML全文浏览量:1
PDF下载量:638
被引次数:0

家庭生活用能调查方案的国际比较及启示

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.7436

廖华¹,
伍敬文¹

1. bob手机在线登陆管理与经济学院能源与环境政策研究中心, 北京 100081

基金项目:

收稿日期:2019-02-19
刊出日期:2019-08-29

关键词:

家庭生活用能/

能源调查/

国际比较

摘要:家庭用能与生产部门用能有不同的影响机制，很多国家开展了家庭用能抽样调查。从调查机构、调查频率、调查对象、调查内容、抽样方法、数据采集、质量控制、数据发布和开放使用等方面对部分国家和国际组织的家庭用能调查方案作出比较和总结。大型的家庭用能调查多由政府主导，且通常是居民生活或住房调查的组成部分，家庭能源专项调查较少。调查内容不仅包括不同能源品种的使用量信息，还区分最终用途。调查手段以入户调查为主，网上调查、邮寄调查和电话调查为辅。现代信息技术为提高调查效率和数据质量提供了重要保障。现有调查中大多数没实现追踪调查。与非官方调查相比，广泛调查数据具有样本大、覆盖面广、抽样科学、可共享等特点。发达国家和发展中国家在调查意识、内容和数据使用方面差异较大。目前中国居民能源调查还不完善，建议在现有的住户调查基础上逐步推进能源调查。

English Abstract

Household Energy Consumption Survey: International Comparison and Implications

LIAO Hua¹,
WU Jingwen¹

1. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100181, China

Received Date:2019-02-19
Publish Date:2019-08-29

Keywords:

Abstract:Energy consumption between the household sector and production sectors have different impact mechanisms,and many countries have conducted household energy consumption surveys. This paper compares and summarizes several household energy consumption programs conducted by some countries or international organizations from survey institutions,survey frequency,survey objects,survey content,sampling methods,data collection,quality control,data release,and open use. Large-scale household energy consumption surveys are mostly government-led and are often part of residential living or housing surveys,with fewer specialized surveys. The survey includes not only the usage information of different energy types but also energy used for various family activities. The survey method is mainly based on face to face interview,supplemented by online surveys,mail surveys and telephone surveys. Modern information technology provides an important guarantee for improving survey efficiency and data quality. Most of the existing surveys did not implement tracking investigations. Compared with unofficial surveys,large-scale survey data has the characteristics of large sample size,wide coverage,scientific sampling,and shareability. Developed and developing countries differ greatly in their survey awareness,content and use of data. There is no specialized household energy consumption survey in China,and it is recommended to gradually promote it based on existing household surveys.

廖华, 伍敬文. 家庭生活用能调查方案的国际比较及启示[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (5): 11-18. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.7436

引用本文:

廖华, 伍敬文. 家庭生活用能调查方案的国际比较及启示[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (5): 11-18.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.7436

Citation:

LIAO Hua, WU Jingwen. Household Energy Consumption Survey: International Comparison and Implications[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2019, (5): 11-18.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.7436

参考文献 (15)