Study on the Convergence System between Administrative Execution and Criminal Justice of Work Safety
-
摘要:目前中国惩治危害生产安全犯罪乏力，折射出安全生产行政执法与刑事司法衔接严重不畅的现实。造成如此困境，其中既有行政立法与刑事立法不协调、判定标准不明确、移送程序不健全等客观原因，也有安全监管部门自身素质不过硬、公安机关选择性执法等主观因素。打通中国安全生产行政执法与刑事司法衔接的制度梗阻，较为可行的路径是从实体和程序两大环节共同发力。首先，突破传统的依附型立法模式，明确危害生产安全犯罪及其相应的罪量标准，并在刑法中增设安全生产危险犯；其次，需要制定《安全监管部门移送涉嫌危害生产安全犯罪案件工作规定》，并出台配套的行政执法证据规则；最后，建立安全生产行政执法案件调查与裁决相分离机制以实现自我约束，同时通过完善信息共享机制，强化外部的监督制约。Abstract:Currently,it's still weaken that china punishes the crime of hazarding work safety. So it can reflect a reality which doesn't have a good connection between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice in a whole production procedure. Basically what causes the above is not only the inferior coordination of administrative legislation and criminal legislation,also the inexplicit decision criteria,the poor transfer procedures and any other relevant subjective causes. And also these objective causes of the poor quality of safety supervision departments and the public security organs' selective law implement can't be liberated away. To a lager extent,the feasible approaches to killing the institutional blocking that is connection between the administrative enforcement of production safety and criminal justice is bettering both the entity and the procedure. Firstly,we must break through the conventional dependent legislation model,simultaneously emphasizing and perfecting the criteria of hazarding production security and any other relevant about it. And then,we need to issue a proposal that is called Work regulations on criminal cases involving production safety transferred by safety supervision departments,and some revenant administrative enforcement proof rules. Finally,we must establish a mechanism that can make investigations of work safety administrative law implement cases get separated from the adjudication to accomplish self-supervision and self-discipline. And simultaneously bettering the information sharing mechanism to consolidate outer supervision and discipline.
-
[1] [2] [3] 国家安全生产监督管理总局.中国安全生产年鉴(2015)[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2016:5. [4] 黎宏.刑法学[M].北京:法律出版社,2012:470-486. [5] 蔡长春.检察机关通过办案促进安全生产秩序持续稳定好转,严查责任事故所涉职务犯罪[N].法制日报,2017-09-22(3). [6] 国家统计局. 2015年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2016-02-29)[2018-01-20].http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201602/t20160229_1323991.htm. [7] 戴佳.去年851人因涉责任事故渎职等职务犯罪被查[N].检察日报,2015-02-28(3). [8] 代海军.安全生产行政执法与刑事司法衔接研究——基于实体法的分析[J].河南财经政法大学学报,2017(3):37-44. [9] 樊华中.重大责任事故罪的处置难点及突围[J].法学,2014(4):155-160. [10] 蔡长春.严查责任事故所涉职务犯罪[N].法制日报,2017-09-22(3). [11] 陈菲,朱薇.巫山"9·13"瓦斯爆炸事故17人被查办[EB/OL].(2015-01-28)[2018-01-06].http://news.xinhuanet.com/2015-01/28/c_1114161411.htm. [12] [13] 薛正俭.两法衔接机制的运行困境与完善路径[J].人民检察,2017(13):66-70. [14] 乔树清.生产安全事故调查处理程序与方法[J].劳动保护,2016(12):16-21. [15] 孙国祥.行政犯违法性判断的从属性和独立性研究[J].法学家,2017(1):48-62. [16] 田村悦一.自由裁量及其界限[M].李哲范,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2016:8. [17] 吴超云.必要与不必要:警察选择性执法的两种面相[J].山东警察学院学报,2017(5):145-154. [18] 彭艳霞,王爱平.行政处罚中渎职犯罪的解析与规制——以徇私舞弊不移交刑事案件的实证研究为视角[J].北京社会科学,2015(11):89-95. [19] 刘恒明.强化安全责任事故背后渎职犯罪查处的路径选择[J].人民检察,2015(8):38-40. [20] 黎宏.刑法学总论(第2版)[M].北京:法律出版社,2016:7. [21] 王春丽.行政执法与刑事司法衔接研究[M].上海:上海社会科学出版社,2013:193-197. [22] 李晓明.行政刑法新论[M].北京:法律出版社,2014:65-70. [23] 时延安,黄璇.行政认定的刑事司法审查[J].人民检察,2017(17):11-15. [24] 许道敏.预防职务犯罪工作联席会议机制研究[J].人民检察,2012(6):11-14. [25] 练育强.行政执法与刑事司法衔接困境与出路[J].政治与法律,2015(11):135-148. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数:606
- HTML全文浏览量:2
- PDF下载量:352
- 被引次数:0
下载:
