Risk Study of ICO Behavior under Block Chain Technology and Its Criminal Law Regulation
-
摘要:作为区块链技术的载体和应用产物，ICO在发挥现代商业拉动经济模式转变的同时也滋生许多新型违法犯罪活动。传统刑法理论和刑事立法对基于区块链技术的ICO行为采取“一刀切”式的限制立场，这将导致传统刑法理论和法条规则与新型网络信息技术的关系日益紧张。面对基于区块链技术的ICO行为，传统刑法的理论和立法在虚拟货币的法律地位、ICO行为法律属性的解读、ICO与其他犯罪行为的分界等方面都未加以明确。中国对基于区块链技术的ICO行为的刑法创新规制宜进一步突出对“募集对象”的规制路径；以非法经营罪作为刑法规制ICO行为的兜底条款；并结合司法实践的具体情形分别进行刑法认定，以完善ICO相关的法律法规的立法工作。Abstract:Being the carrier and application product of block chain technology, ICO brings forth many new illegal and criminal activities while playing the role of modern business-driven economic model transformation. Traditional criminal law theories and criminal legislation take a "one-size-for-all" prohibition stance against ICO based on block chain technology, which will lead to an increasingly tense relationship between traditional criminal law theories, rules and novel network information technology. In the face of ICO behaviors based on block chain technology, traditional criminal law theories and legislation are particularly limited in terms of the legal status of virtual currency and the interpretation of the legal properties of ICO behaviors, and the boundary between ICO and other criminal behaviors. China's innovation regulation of criminal law for ICO behavior should further the regulation of collecting objects, take the crime of illegal business operation as the backstop clause of ICO behavior regulated by criminal law, and confirm the criminal law according to the specific situation, i.e. using fraudulent means to defraud public deposits or MLM, so as to improve the laws and regulations related to ICO.
-
[1] 蒋辉宇. ICO融资行为的挑战:我国非法集资行为刑法规制路径的反思与应然选择[J]. 财经理论与实践践,2019,40(2):12-19. [2] 邓建鹏. ICO非法集资问题的法学思考[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,40(8):40-49. [3] 杨慧琴,孙磊,赵西超. 基于区块链技术的互信共赢型供应链信息平台构建[J]. 科技进步与对策,2018,35(5):21-31. [4] 范家琛. 众筹商业模式研究[J]. 企业经济,2013(8):72-75. [5] 王化群. 智能合约中的安全与隐私保护技术[J]. 南京邮电大学学报(自然科学版),2019(4):63-71. [6] 刘春彦,徐圣艳,刘伯一. 美国及澳大利亚虚拟货币及首次代币发行监管最新进展评析[J]. 中国证券期货,2018(2):63-71. [7] 于志刚,唐磊. 网络法作为独立部门法的正当性研究——从法理和实证的统合视角再议"马法之争"[J]. 江汉论坛,2020(2):130-138. [8] 于志刚. 网络犯罪立法与法学研究契合的方向[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2015,27(6):23-31. [9] 安邦咨询. 打击ICO意在捍卫央行货币发行权[J]. 中国经济报告,2017(10):88-89. [10] 中国证监监督管理委员会. 中国人民银行、中央网信办、工业和信息化部、工商总局、银监会、证监会、保监会关于防范代币发行融资风险的公告[EB/OL].(2017-09-04)[2020-07-04]. http://www.csrc.gov.cn/pub/newsite/zjhxwfb/xwdd/201709/t20170904_323047.html. [11] 陈伟,蔡荣. 互联网金融刑法规制的路径选择与展望[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2016,47(5):104-111. [12] TREVOR I. Beyond bitcoin:issues in regulating blockchain transactions[J]. Duke Law Journal,December,2015(65):569-608. [13] 赵云虎. 首次代币发行法律监管研究[D]. 上海:华东政法大学,2018:12-46. [14] 张绍谦. 试论行政犯中行政法规与刑事法规的关系——从著作权犯罪的"复制发行"说起[J]. 政治与法律, 2011(8):40-50. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数:489
- HTML全文浏览量:0
- PDF下载量:17
- 被引次数:0
下载:
